CONCORD, N.H. —
State investigators said Tuesday that a fatal police shooting in Thornton last year was justified.
Officials from the New Hampshire attorney general's office said Thornton police Officer Matthew Yao was justified in using deadly force when he shot and killed 37-year-old Ethan Freeman in October 2020.
"All of the other evidence gathered from the investigation supports the conclusion that Officer Yao did reasonably believe that he faced the imminent use of deadly physical force from Mr. Freeman at the time that the officer fired his pistol," said Assistant Attorney General Peter Hinkley.
At a briefing on Tuesday, officials displayed body camera video from Yao that captured three interactions between him and Freeman that day, including the fatal encounter at Freeman's apartment.
Officials said the body cam was critical in the case because they were able to match what the officer said to investigators with what was actually seen on the video.
At the apartment, officials said, Yao encountered a naked, bloody and irrational Freeman who, while inside, was holding a broken piece of furniture. In the video, Freeman threatens to kill Yao, jumps out a window and, while unarmed, advances on him.
"Officer Yao believed that when Mr. Freeman, who he heard had threatened his life, ultimately reached him, he would attempt to take his gun and shoot him," Hinckley said.
Slavshit
Sandshit
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Good work Officer Yao, you did everything you could.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Damn, he really did try
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
I dont really always understand this ,maybe you can help me out .. All that police have to do ( to de-escalate ) is simply just leave .In this case ,he IS the agitating force. I would understand if there is women,children or animals in danger BUT this Guy is smoking crack in his own house alone..So ,ok ?
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The problem is, WHEN do you stop him? Only after he's maimed or killed someone? All it takes is one mail carrier to get ambushed, then it becomes 'why didn't the police stop him sooner??'
It's an unfortunate situation to be put into for sure, and one that doesn't always have a clear-cut solution. No two calls are the same. There's always a mixed up set of variables at play. What works for once case may not work for another. This is one of those situations.
Could he have left? Sure. But this guy was a bloody mess, probably cut himself up in his crack rage. He needed medical attention. Unfortunately, he chose not to accept the help he was being given. Sober or not, that's on him, not the officer.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
I can't tell if you are serious or not
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
you're retarded
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context