Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Trying to crush any survivors?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

He had no ammo left

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I Hope these series continues !

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

What do you think this tank is shooting here? Canister rounds?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Not sure if the t72 even has canister rounds, I'd say it's either HE or HE-FRAG which would be the closest the canister rounds and most fitting against Infantry.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Probably right.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I watched this and wondered, why don't these russians surrender?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Not that easy to surrender to a tank. If they come out of cover they will probably get runned over.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

In part one you see a white flag waving but the tank ignores it and kills them all... Russians Ukrainians or whoever - killing a surrendering man should be (if it isn't already) a crime.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

In part one you also see them shooting on the tank with rocket launchers multiple times... If I were surrendering I wouldn't shoot or throw granades, step clearly out and give up.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

In a live combat situation accepting a surrender is usually deemed to not be possible and it isn't unlawful to ignore (per the Geneva convention at least). It's not like they were gunned down while trying to peacefully give themselves up.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Even if it were true, you can't trust Russians, especially in war. Just ask a Russian.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think they are not allowed to.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

And they're probably shot or maimed if they do. No winners, here.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Well yeah obviously, but would you not rather survive?

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

They would not survive 100% if surrendering. That’s ne next issue. They are told that they aren’t allowed to surrender bc if so they will be tortured and lastly killed. That’s what their government tells them, that’s why they are more likely to take a direct tank hit, then surrendering

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

We saw plenty of footage showing russian POWs get tortured and lastly killed, its not what their government tells them bruh

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That is so stupid

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Bravo 👏🏽

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

This war is so fascinating. Dont get me wrong, I dont condone it in any way but it has laid bare some interesting developments in warfare.

Battles are, very rougly speaking, fought the same way today as it has been for thousands of years: Two lines of infantry clashing head on while each opponent tries to outflank or otherwise punch through said line.

When militaries moved to semi- and since fully automatic weapons in the previous century, said lines of infantry had to always be near cover, or be easily gunned down. What the war in Ukraine firstly proves, is that trenches remain the simplest and most cost effective way of creating such cover.

What the war in Ukraine also proves is much more interesting, and raises questions that I can't wait to see answered. The two above mentioned infantry lines remain somewhat the same as always. Very interestingly, however, almost all the old, tried and true methods of outflanking and punching through have proven worthless. For the past 100 years we've been able to go around and over the infantry line (with automobiles and planes respectively). For 75 years we've even been able to punch straight through it with tanks.

But today, modern improvements in artillery (HIMARS, for example) and UAVs, along with improvements in hand-held anti-armor weapons such as the N-LAW have made the classic tools to break the stalemate obsolete.

Now, as mentioned, what I am personally very intrigued to see is how we are next going to break this stalemate. Some of the greatest innovations in the history of warfare have come through wanting to break through entrenched positions; Planes, tanks, artillery and even to some extent the nuke. So long as they stay away from the nukey-nukey option, I can't wait to see what they come up with next.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think the next step will be improving every aspects of drone warfare. Improved, small and deadly drones flying all over the battlefield and improved anti drone weapons will become the new standards i guess. Cheap yet very effective suicide drones are also a thing, as well as guided missiles and bombs, a lot of improvement potential.

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

:#marcake:

Snapshots:

Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.