CHILD WARNING Suicide jumper lands on stroller (child death)

There are plenty of better reasons for finding and sharing this kind of content than the edgelord approach of "ha, look at these dickheads, they're cut clean off!" Spreading truth and awareness, fighting back against censorship, or exposing crimes and criminals for who they are: Pieces of shit. Not everyone who digs for gore and death thinks it's "awesome," so don't pretend like we're all amoral scumbags.

Look I get it, not everyone is in this for a righteous cause, I'll admit I'm not. I'm simply fascinated with death and injury and wish to study it first-hand, from a safe place. I'd be a hypocrite to question anyone's sense of morality. But even if you're just in this for selfish reasons of morbid indulgence like me, the least you can do is pretend to be a decent human being and show the proper amount of respect for the dead and dying. That's the difference between a cold heart and a sadistic monster.

u don’t have to shut up I love you and am bored

For real. I have been through a lot in my life. Like, a LOT. One of the things I've been through is losing a child, a couple through miscarriage and one as an infant. Neither was unexpected though, and were the result of some genetic health issues. But the suddenness of someone just randomly falling out of the sky, on your baby- I can't imagine losing a child in such a manner. Like what are the chances.

Literally the equivalent of “not your fault”. We’re taught to look both ways, not up. But I’m sure they’ll continue to imagine what it would be like if they moved 3 seconds earlier or later

Not in Canada lol

It won’t be!

The edgelording part of it is an interpretation, there is an assumed intention trough the inability not to imagine a state in which a person comments x for a y reason, this y reason is a projection of the possible state in which oneself would comment x. Admittedly there is included some inductive evidence for this assumption (there are actual people worthy the label) but the under-determination 'problem' here is that the comment itself is not proof of the applicability of the rule upon it however general you may find the rule, this in conclusion is the reason why internet trolling is a thing, why literal levels on top of levels of irony and satire feeds on this under determination accompanying 'it does not matter what I write' behavior.

It is simply stupid not to understand how these short comments tells you nothing of the person commenting them, except for in the negative (as it does you), meaning I can be very certain you are not trolling me by reacting negatively towards the "edgelords", and it does tell me something about a given someone what they do not understand, given the finitude of the system (the world) they appear in.

You may justify the assumption aware of its exceptions (in applicability), given the potential of a growing uncivil discourse. My only contention with that would be merely to the degree by which to do so, as to the degree most here does it I judge their heads being far up their asses, I may read to much into it, falling in my own trap, I do not think so, but you tell me.