What are your opinions on the implementation of a Fight/Brain Dead category? I think it would be a good addition. I know a few people are going to shoot back, “BUT ITS NOT PEOPLE DYING”. My rebuttal to that is that we already have a self harm category. Of which implies no one is dying, as if they die then it’s not self harm but instead a suicide. Which is an entirely different category.
Should we have a “Fight”, and or “Brain damage” category?
- 42
- 80
Top Poster of the Day:
su1c1de
Deaths Today: 0
Current Registered Users: 2,036,784
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS
SITE GUIDE
PING GROUPS
Discussion
For highly intellectual and cultured conversations about death or other related topics. If you're looking to spark a conversation, do so here.
Keep shitposts and questions about your favorite ice cream in /h/social.
DEATH
GORE
SOCIAL
ACTIVE CONFLICTS
Slavshit
Sandshit
Live commit: b40847a
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I'd think most fights would go under the 'Beating' category...as for brain damage, that could be a flair but ffs it would be a common one. Most of the videos with any sort of blunt force trauma already contain what I assume to be some sort of brain damage if not death. Personally I think the categories already cover these both pretty well.
What might be more helpful is a 'No Death' flair or warning or w/e. Then if you had a fight where no one is technically dead you could still have it in the 'beating' category with a 'no death' warning.
Then again the rules do say posts must include people dying so, I dunno, maybe another category entirely is warranted to not muddle the ones that do include people dying.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context