![House Furry Founder House Furry Founder](https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/i/houses/Furry Founder.webp?x=8)
![@G-tix's profile picture](https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/17001722516551092r.webp)
SNAPPY QUOTES: SUGGEST NEW SNAPPY QUOTES HERE
- 120
- 17
Top Poster of the Day:
harassment
![](https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/1718807655606148r.webp)
![This user is banned and needs to do better!](https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/i/hats/Behind Bars.webp?x=8)
Deaths Today: 0
Current Registered Users: 2,300,145
![sidebar image](https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/i/WPD/sidebar/622.webp?x=8)
Meta
For questions, comments, and concerns about the website itself. If you want to ask or talk about features, updates, and so on, post about it here.
Keep in mind, we have a dedicated post for bugs and suggestions.
DEATH
GORE
SOCIAL
ACTIVE CONFLICTS
Rules
- You must be 18 or older to use this site. Report under-18 users. Do not engage in further contact with a user you know is a minor for any reason.
- Do not post anything illegal under US law.
- Do not threaten or advocate violence.
- Do not sexualize minors.
- Do not post animal cruelty/abuse.
- Do not request illegal content.
- No doxing. No witch hunts.
- Don't dox or threaten to dox other WPD users, even offsite.
- Posts must include videos of people dying except in the designated Gore category of flairs.
- The Discussion, Social, Meta, Pets and Music flairs are intentionally off-topic and do not require people dying.
- Videos that only include aftermath of a serious accident/incident or current event may be allowed.
- No animal death unless there's also a human dying in the video.
- No posts centering on abuse/excessive suffering of children.
- Titles should be as descriptive as possible.
- Additional context, images, or sources are always encouraged and appreciated. No joke titles please.
- If there is a child hurt or killed, please use the Child Warning checkbox while creating a post.
- No explicit racism or bigotry. Some of our service providers are very sensitive.
- Humor is fine, but comments that are just low effort shock value spam may be removed. Feel free to express your opinions but please try to express them in a reasonable manner.
- No overtly pornographic stuff, including "snuff porn".
- In general: no solely fetish-oriented material.
- No reposts within 60 days
- Also no reposts of famous videos (unless you have a more HQ version, have a different POV, or are doing a writeup on it). These are listed below.
FAMOUS VIDEOS:
The beheadings of Louisa Vesterager Jespersen and Maren Ueland
1444 (Russian man shoots himself on his couch)
Gary Plauché shoots his son's rapist
Ms. Pacman (woman with her head split open)
Funky Town (cartel flaying+torturing)
Sponsored by Adidas (cartel organ extraction + cannibalism)
The Guerrero Flaying (aka No Mercy in Mexico)
3 Guys 1 Hammer (Dnepropetrovsk Maniacs)
Girl shoots her cousin then kills herself (Paris Harvey)
French dude gets impaled on a bollard after jumping from a building
Mangue 937/ Mangrove 937/ Swamp Girls
The Zacatecas flaying - CDN flaying head and removing heart of La Linea's member
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Concepts such as brutality, consent, desire, legality and morality are inherent but ultimately defined by institutions; therefore, not all social constructs can apply to every unique individual in a logical way. The argument that cannibalism should be legalised between consenting adults is one that has been raised by many over the course of human civilization, sometimes due to existing cases that have been brought to attention in court. The argumentative statement, however, is very clear with its terms: human cannibalism is the act involving “eating of human flesh by humans” (Encyclopedia Britannica, 2024), consenting adult means “person who is legally considered old enough to decide” (Merriam-Webster, 2024) his or her course of action, and to legalise refers to the political action of “allow[ing] something by law” (Cambridge Dictionary, 2024). In this manner, it is only logical that cannibalism between adults who had agreed to consent to eating or be eaten by the other participant be legalised, provided there is ample opportunity to properly discuss the consequences and conditions beforehand. The argument is that consent between two adults is ultimately made, altered and limited by preferences and agreement, and cannot be judged by outside factors once made.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context