Shooting
Autismo
Excessive harassment. Both in chat and on my wall post. No provocation
1yr ago
(video post)
3,934 thread views
#5221
Man is shot to death during custody dispute in Lubbock (2 angles & news source)
- 128
- 89
Top Poster of the Day:
King_Of_Slavshit
Deaths Today: 0
Current Registered Users: 2,288,381
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS
SITE GUIDE
PING GROUPS
Shooting
Where deaths by gunshot will find themselves. High-profile assassinations or your everyday drug trafficker being killed by a hitman.
DEATH
GORE
SOCIAL
ACTIVE CONFLICTS
Slavshit
Sandshit
Live commit: 5ac0e50
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
iirc the woman habitually refused to let him see his son during his approved custody time.
he just wanted to see his son.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Understandable, but doesn’t change the fact that the was technically trespassing and then got aggressive with an armed man.
His custody issue should have been handled through the legal process, not through a screaming match while trespassing.
While he has my sympathies, I don’t feel sorry for him. He made a stupid decision and chose the worst time and manner to make his objection heard and paid with his life.
His ex’ new man did nothing wrong, and I’m glad Texas objective self-defense laws recognized that.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I disagree. That man is apart of with holding the man he killed from seeing his son.
In my opinion, the guy in blue shit should have killed the man in cold blood. Taking a man’s child is dramatically worse than trespassing. I’d say the woman and that man should have lost their lives.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Let the courts figure it out. Don’t start trying to pull a rifle from an aggravated dude when he’s already told you to get off his property.
Darwin Award winner
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
It’s a good thing American laws don’t follow your emotion-driven, subjective reasoning and are based on objective principles 🤷🏻♂️
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I think you are the one being emotional here.
Unless you are perfectly okay that someone invite you and your family to his home and proceed to seduce and fuck both your month and sister, and tell you to leave, and when you argue with him he shoot you.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Damn, you really can’t type. That’s a total mess dude, get help.
I think I understand what you said there though, and yes, if someone invited me to their home and then told me to leave I would for sure leave. I wouldn’t argue with them over it and if they pulled out a gun the chances of me getting in their face would decrease, not increase.
If you are suggesting that the man was entitled to threaten and assault the other guy in his house because he is now fucking his former wife then yes, you are for sure the one using a standard that is completely arbitrary and emotion-driven. You don’t have a right to behave this way in other peoples homes because you are salty your woman left you for them.
Again, I’m glad the laws in Texas are smarter and more objective than you 🤷🏻♂️
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
wow you just downvote me without reply? I know I should have block edgy kid like you.
You know people like you like to think the guy deserved to be killed because he violated the law, it is because deep down you can't accept how fuck up sometime life is, and by thinking it that way it make you feel safe and warm.|
Yep going to block immature people like you to save me sometime.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I don’t know what the fuck you are talking about, I’ve replied to every single one of your idiotic comments.
I never said he deserved to get shot because violated the law lol
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
99.9% when normal people talk, they talk about what is "right" not only from a law POV but also from a moral POV, practical POV..etc
So if the law in Texas changed so that women should be stoned to death if they stopping her ex-husband to to visit his children, do you still stand by the law 100%?
In practical POV Chad is pretty stupid, but me and the other person is also pointing out the moral issue of the situation, which you seem to pretend not a thing, which is not very wise.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
Yeah but i dont think using a gun would be the best solution to that
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
dad isn't the one with the gun...ex-wife's new man killed her son's father and wasn't even charged
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
The guy who killed him is also married to a local judge. He’s a total scum bag who killed some man looking for his kid. He doesn’t even care about that man’s kids or the woman he was fucking.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
i may be retarded
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
same
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context
More options
Context