1:32 Shot Taser By Police
Ohio
Top Poster of the Day:
drownedcarcass
Deaths Today: 0
Current Registered Users: 2,302,510
BROWSE EFFORTPOSTS
SITE GUIDE
PING GROUPS
WPD SOCIAL
Ever wanted to just shoot the shit with the kind of people who make accounts on a gore website and then come to chat? Probably not. But that's okay! You clicked this category for some reason, so that's what you're going to do. Post a thread. Start a fight. Get your dick out. Share some Garfield comics. Tell WPD how you want everyone here to die. Call them racial slurs because your penis is small and it upsets you.
If it doesn't fit anywhere else, post it here!
DEATH
GORE
SOCIAL
ACTIVE CONFLICTS
Slavshit
Sandshit
Live commit: a370c07
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
I haven't done any further research into this situation, so maybe I'm missing something, but I feel like there's an aspect to this that I haven't seen anyone mention. Based on what's in the video, this shows a young brown man who has been pulled over by a cop in a rural area with few people around. It seems that the cop already had the gun drawn at the very beginning of the video, before he started asking the man to put his phone down, which could mean that the man's reason for recording in the first place was because he felt like he could be in danger of getting shot/tasered. I'm assuming whatever he was pulled over for wasn't like a heinous crime or something, so having a weapon pulled on him from the get-go was probably unexpected and pretty scary, especially when he's a brown man in an empty, rural area of the US with no one around. The trustworthiness of the police and other authorities has been in question for decades, now more than ever. It is very possible this man was genuinely very afraid of the situation, so he decided to record it as a way of trying to protect himself from harm, not because he wanted internet fame. If he didn't record it, the police could find a reason to shoot him anyways, and if there's no civilian witnesses, it probably wouldn't be hard to get it ruled as self-defense in court. By recording, he has a bit more insurance, though not very much.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Why are you assuming he didn't commit a heinous crime? I think it's much safer to assume this isn't happening because he ran a stop sign. You're rationalizing what you want to believe. You made a whole story to support an idea with zero evidence.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
More options
Context
More options
Context