None
202
Lewiston, Maine mass shooting MEGATHREAD (18 dead)

Video above is live coverage of the event.

Photos of shooter:

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/1698287367920187.webp https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16982873684041374.webp https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16982873688593862.webp https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16982873692136843.webp

Over 60 13 reported injured so far. If video of the shooting comes out I'll move this to /h/shooting.

Article about event. He shot up a bowling alley and a bar. He tried to shoot up a Walmart but failed to hit a single person.

Walmart aftermath:

Audio of shooting:

They're looking for a "Robert R Card", the police scanner is saying they tracked down his car and they're looking for him in the forest.

Here's Card's Twitter btw. nvm nuked here's an archive of his only tweet

Press release from Maine police:

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16983060545294251.webp

Going off the above info, we're probably looking at a schizo mass shooter.

Reported to have an AR-15 with a nightscope and potentially a police scanner.

Possible 2nd suspect, they're onto a suspicious black pickup.

Found dead October 27: https://www.nbcboston.com/news/local/maine-mass-shooting-suspect-found-dead-sources-say/3173562

None

You can see his dick fall out of his shorts when he stands up to assess the damage.

Very bad day

None
235
CHILD WARNING No Mercy In Mexico (Longer Version + No Watermark + Translation In Desc) [CW]

Translation:

(Father and son are somewhere in the mountains of Guerrero, shirtless and surrounded by a group of about 6 hitmen dressed in jeans, button down shirts and bulletproof vests)

takes off dad's blindfold

-We brought you your son

-Open your eyes

-Why the hell didn't you let us know how the situation was? You know we don't like rats, you know?

almost whispering

-Yes sir

-And why didn't you tell us that the fucking "Badger" asked you for information and you gave it to him, son of a bitch? Hey?

begins to hit him with a log while he is on the ground moaning and the hitmen in the background tell the boy to calm down and pat him while he starts to cry

-* the executioner removes his partner who was consoling the child and tells the child * open your eyes and come here, accommodate this child

continues questioning father

-Bastard, what the hell does your wife know?

-Nothing

-And if I bring it here?

sobbing

-no no no

turns to the camera

-Look, "Badger", I'm going to tell you something, son of a bitch, no one has played with us and it's going to be very difficult for you to get into our territory, first the same thing is going to happen to you like this fucking hunk

Continues to hit him several times with the trunk

-Come and take the blows away, son of a bitch, and I'm going to tell you, Viagra's Cartel rules here, all those rats that are giving out information, we are going to kill them. Open your eyes, kid, and if he closes his eyes, break the fuck outta him.

  • They begin to decapitate the father with a small knife while his son cries, screams and writhes on the floor *

-Hits the boy GET UP, GET UP OR I'LL GET YOU UP. This is what you provoked "Badger", and we are going for your whole family, nobody plays with us, and there goes your New Year's gift bitch, you know you messed with a Junior (son or grandson of a senior member of the Cartel). Hey kid, get comfortable, come here, (he drags him by the hair while he trembles and cries on the floor) relax, calm down.

  • There is a cut in the video and it resumes when he is totally bloodied on the headless corpse of his father but with no visible injuries *

Do you know what I'm going to do with your head? I'm going to send it to your mother, I want her to die like the rats that are sons of a bitch

-Slowly

  • Slowly

stabs him in the heart and they both growl

-what's up? what's up? there is nothing there, heat is what there is and it is increasing every day more

stabs him again and the boy sobs

-That's it, bark like dog, bark shit . Grab the kid's hands and feet, I'm going to rip his heart out

-Nooo he cries and tries to get up

-Grab the rat, grab the rat , grab it well, grab it with balls

begins to skin his chest as the boy screams and tries to squirm, then proceeds to stab him directly through the heart

-Don't let the son of a bitch go, I'm going to skin him alive so you know who's in charge here.

-There are carnitas for a while background laughs

-So you know who's in charge here, huh? huh? slaps him and by now he's skinned from chest to navel except for his arms

-you see son of a bitch, you fucking little rat he proceeds to cut his ribs

-dipped cigarette laughs

-How has your nephew been? background conversation of someone on the phone

-There is the carnage, he was well destroyed

-Look bitch, your New Year's gift motherfucker puts the corpses of father and son together and leaves the knife stuck in his chest

-And this goes for "Badger" and all those who are getting into the boss territory, we are going to fucking kill them assholes and they are going to end up worse than these assholes bitches because neither "Badger" nor anyone else is going to come to rescue them, and get in mind that we are going to wait for you and we are waiting for you and we have to receive you bitch.

The camera focuses on the corpses and the video ends

None
1156

Matsudo City, Chiba Prefecture, Japan

Two 16yo Japanese highschool girls, one of them allegedly pregnant, have livestreamed their suicide on 12th of April 2023.

The suicide is said to be related to love affairs where the girls have failed to win the heart of their "senpai" who is a famous Japanese cosplay livestreamer.

Autopsy efforts are on the way to find out the father of the child which died with the 16yo young mother.

The girls (the first girl is 16, she has a Twitter account that is still up, where she posted her final goodbye)

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/1695383108717155.webp https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/1695383108874136.webp https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16953831090697594.webp

The cosplay livestreamer (https://twitter.com/pyascal3640)

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/1695383109684424.webp https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16953831097233353.webp

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16953831097706.webp

Apparently besides being a cosplay livestreamer he was also a host at a host bar, where he met the girl(s)

Following the suicides, he posted this on Twitter:

My girlfriend committed suicide.

She jumped off a rooftop holding hands with her friend.

She was a listener. We exchanged dm's everyday and I fell in love with her. After a while we started dating and getting to know each other better.

She was dying in her room until she found me on social media. She saw me on video, got inspired, and decided to live again. I was everything to her.

I had been making her feel insecure because I was a host in my activities.

We would sometimes argue, and every time we argued, I would see a side of her that I didn't like.

I told her that I would distance myself from her.

She called me the day before yesterday and said, "I will die if you are gone. I've already come to Tokyo to die. I decided to meet with her in person the next day and convince her that I really needed some time away.

She desperately denied it. I tried to convince her in tears that it was a busy time for her with her birthday festival coming up and that she had a lot of anxiety and it was mentally difficult for her. Gradually she calmed down and agreed. When we parted, she said, "I want to be with you.

She said, "I want to have sex with you.

I refused.

When I learned that she had jumped, I called the police and told them that I wanted to turn myself in. Later, a detective came and told me that I was innocent.

I broke down in tears.

I broke down in tears. I felt really stupid for not being able to stop her from committing suicide right in front of me.

If only I had been able to give her a hug at that time, maybe she would still be alive.

I thought about dying too. However, I just cried and cried and cried again when I remembered her.

To be honest, I wish I could die soon and go to be with her. I don't think she will forgive me. Even so, I want to see her again and give her a hug.

Every time I think of her face, I want to die.

I don't know if I will be able to live, but I will carry this unforgivable sin on my shoulders, and I will spend the rest of my life atoning for the sins I think I have committed.

I am very sorry to the bereaved families, the people involved, and everyone who has supported me, for betraying your expectations.


THX to @kkdvivivi for the background info

None

Basic Information:

--

The case began on June 6, 1996, when Routier called 911 reporting that an intruder had broken into her home in Rowlett, Texas, and attacked her and her two sons, Damon and Devon, while they were sleeping.

Upon arrival, emergency responders found Devon, aged 6, dead at the scene, while Damon, aged 5, died shortly after being transported to the hospital. Routier herself had sustained stab wounds. She told police that an intruder had entered the house and attacked them, but she had survived.

However, the police investigation raised doubts about Routier's account. Evidence suggested the crime scene might have been staged and that Routier's wounds were self-inflicted. The prosecution argued that Routier murdered her sons due to financial stress and a desire to rid herself of responsibilities that interfered with her lifestyle.

In 1997, Darlie Routier was convicted of the murder of her younger son, Damon, and sentenced to death. The case against her was primarily based on the forensic evidence gathered at the scene, as well as the behavior she exhibited in the days following the murders, including a videotape of her spraying silly string at her sons' graves during a birthday commemoration, which the prosecution used to question her character.

Routier has maintained her innocence, and her case has garnered a significant amount of attention and support from those who believe she was wrongfully convicted. Advocates for Routier argue that the investigation was flawed, the trial was biased, and that there was a lack of direct evidence linking her to the murders. Over the years, there have been numerous appeals and requests for forensic testing of evidence using advanced techniques not available during the original trial.


Images of Darlie , as well as her with her two sons:

--

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/0tw10uzi.jpg

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/8h9p3dv7.jpg

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/in9hzpg5.gif

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/fn5od4k8.jpg

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/slk2pbu.jpg

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/g686pix0.jpg


Information on Darlie Routier:

--

She is classified as a murderer, specifically having committed parricide. The crime involved the killing of two victims, identified as her own children, Damon aged 5, and Devon aged 6. The murders occurred on June 6, 1996, in Rowlett, Texas, USA. Darlie Lynn Routier was apprehended on June 18, 1996, and was subsequently sentenced to death on February 4, 1997. The method employed in this tragic incident was stabbing with a knife. Darlie Lynn Routier was born on January 4, 1970.


Links to Autopsy reports of Damon and Devon Routier:

--

Damon's:

https://murderpedia.org/female./R/images/routier-darlie/damon-routier-autopsy.pdf

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/92wcxkhq.jpg

Devon's:

https://murderpedia.org/female./R/images/routier-darlie/devon-routier-autopsy.pdf

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/4w5yv2d7.jpg


Here's the 991 call, voice is Darlie Routier, the murderer:

--

--

TRANSCRIPT


911 TRANSCRIPT

Recorded by The Rowlett Police Department

June 6, 1996.

Transcript created by Barry Dickey

(*This transcript was done after the state "enhanced" the recording and is not accurate)

Time ID Conversation/Sounds

00:0 0:00 911 Operator #1 ...Rowlett 911...what is your emergency..

00: 01:19 Darlie Routier ...somebody came here...they broke in...

00:0 3:27 911 Operator #1 ...ma'am...

00:05 :brainletbush: Darlie Routier ...they just stabbed me and my children...

00:0 7:16 911 Operator #1 ...what...

00:0 8:05 Darlie Routier ...they just stabbed me and my kids...my little boys...

00:0 9:24 911 Operator #1 ...who...who did...

0 0:1 1:12 Darlie Routier ...my little boy is dying...

00 :1 1:25 RADIO ...(unintelligible) clear...

00:1 3:07 911 Operator #1 ...hang on ...hang on... hang on

00:15 :03 Darlie Routier ...hurry... (unintelligible)...

00:16:01 911 Operator #1 ...stand by for medical emergency

00:1 8:brainletbush: Darlie Routier ...ma'am...

00:1 8:19 911 Operator #1 ...hang on ma'am...

00:2 1:26 Darlie Routier ...ma'am...

00:2 3:00 911 Operator #1 ...unknown medical emergency... 5801 Eagle Drive...

00:2 4:00 RADIO ...(unintelligible)...

00:2 6:24 Darlie Routier ...ma'am...

00:2 7:12 911 Operator #1 ...ma'am... I'm trying to get an ambulance to you... hang on a minute...

00:28:20 RADIO ...(siren)...

00:29:13 Darlie Routier ...oh my God ...my babies are dying...

00:30:12 Darin Routier ...(unintelligible)...

00:31:09 911 Operator #1 ...what's going on ma'am...

00:32:13 Darlie Routier ...(unintelligible) ...oh my God...

00:33:49 RADIO ...(tone - signal broadcast)...

00:34:01 Background Voice ...(unintelligible)...

00:35:20 Darlie Routier ...(unintelligible) thought he was dead ...oh my God...

00:39:08 Darin Routier ...(unintelligible)...

00:3 9:29 Darlie Routier ...I don't even know (unintelligible)...

00:40 :22 911 Operator #1 ...attention 901 unknown medical emergency 5801...

00:42 :23 Darin Routier ...(unintelligible)...

00:43 :15 Darlie Routier ...I don't even know (unintelligible)...

00:44 :04 911 Operator #1 ...Eagle Drive ...Box 238 ...cross street Linda Vista and Willowbrook ...attention 901 medial emergency...

00:49 :wolfhoundour: Darlie Routier ...who was breathing...

00:4 0:10 Darin Routier ...(unintelligible)...

00:51 :15 Darlie Routier ...(unintelligible) are they still laying there (unintelligible)...

00:5 1:19 911 Operator #1 ...may be possible stabbing ...5801 Eagle Drive ...Box 238 ...cross street Linda Vista and Willowbrook...

00 55:06 Darlie Routier ...oh my God ...what do we do...

00:5 7:17 911 Operator #1 ...time out 2:32...

00:58 :26 Darlie Routier ...oh my God...

00:58 :wolfhoundour: 911 Operator #1 ...stamp me a card Clint...

01:0 1:02 911 Operator #1 ...80...

01:01 :16 RADIO ...(unintelligible)...

01:0 2:13 Darlie Routier ...oh my God...

01:0 3:05 RADIO ...(unintelligible)...

01: 04:07 911 Operator #1 ...need units going towards 5801 Eagle Drive ...5801 Eagle Drive

01:0 4:07 Darlie Routier ...oh my God ...my baby's dead...

01:07 :08 Darlie Routier ...Damon ...hold on honey...

01:0 8:brainletbush: Darin Routier ...(unintelligible)...

01: 08:22 911 Operator #1 ...hysterical female on the phone...

01:1 0:03 Darlie Routier ...(unintelligible)...

01:1 0:10 Darin Routier ...(unintelligible)...

01:10 :26 911 Operator #1 ...says her child has been stabbed

0 1:11:wolfhoundour: Darlie Routier ...I saw them Darin...

01:12 :21 Darin Routier ...oh my God ...(unintelligible) ...came in here...

01:14 :10 911 Operator #1 ...ma'am ...I need you to calm down and talk to me...

01:14 :24 RADIO ...(unintelligible)...

01:16 :25 Darlie Routier ...ok...

01:16 :26 SOUND ...(unintelligible)...

01:17 :12 911 Operator #1 ...twice Clint...

01: 18:26 Darlie Routier ...didn't you get my address...

01:2 0:19 911 Operator #1 ...5801 Eagle...

01:2 2:00 Darlie Routier ...yes ...we need help...

01:2 2:03 RADIO ...(unintelligible) will be enroute code...

01:2 4:20 Darlie Routier ...Darin ...I don't know who it was...

01:2 4:23 911 Operator #1 ...2:33 code...

01: 26:15 Darlie Routier ...we got to find out who it was...

01 :27:12 911 Operator #1 ...ma'am...

01:2 8:04 911 Operator #1 ...ma'am listen ...listen to me...

01:2 9:27 Darlie Routier ...yes ...yes ...(unintelligible)...

01:3 0:23 RADIO ...(unintelligible) I'm clear ...do you need anything...

01:3 2:08 Darin Routier ...(unintelligible)...

01: 32:20 Darlie Routier ...oh my God...

01:3 4:00 911 Operator #1 ...(unintelligible)...

01:3 4:22 911 Operator #1 ...do you take the radio Clint...

01:3 5:23 911 Operator #2 ...yes...

01:36 :12 Darlie Routier ...oh my God...

01:3 6:25 911 Operator #1 ...I...ma'am...

01:3 8:03 Darlie Routier ...yes...

01:3 8:17 911 Operator #1 ...I need you to ...

01: 38:23 RADIO ...(unintelligible) start that way (unintelligible)... will revise...

01: 39:wolfhoundour: 911 Operator #1 ...I need you to talk to me...

01: 41:21 Darlie Routier ...what ...what ...what...

01:4 4:25 RADIO ...(unintelligible)...

01:44 :wolfhoundour: Darlie Routier ...my babies are dead (unintelligible)...

01:4 6:20 RADIO ...go ahead and start that way ...siren code 4 ...advise...

01:4 7:10 Darlie Routier ...(unintelligible)...

01:48 :03 Darlie Routier ...(unintelligible) do you want honey ...hold on (unintelligible)...

01:4 9:17 911 Operator #1 ...ma'am ...I can't understand you...

01:5 0:21 Darlie Routier ...yes...

01:51 :18 911 Operator #1 ...you're going to have to slow down ...calm down ...and talk to me...

01:5 2:19 Darlie Routier ...I'm talking to my babies ...they're dying...

01:5 5:03 911 Operator #1 ...what is going on...

01:5 6:29 Darlie Routier ...somebody came in while I was sleeping ...me and my little boys were sleeping downstairs...

02:0 2:00 RADIO ...(unintelligible) I'll be clear...

02:0 2:20 Darlie Routier ...some man ...came in ...stabbed my babies ...stabbed me ...I woke up ...I was fighting ...he ran out through the garage ...threw the knife down ...my babies are dying ...they're dead ...oh my God...

02: 14:23 911 Operator #1 ...ok ...stay on the phone with me...

02: 16:brainletbush: Darin Routier ...(unintelligible)...

02:1 7:06 Darlie Routier ...oh my God...

02:1 7:29 911 Operator #1 ...what happened (unintelligible) dispatch 901...

02:2 0:15 Darlie Routier ...hold on honey ...hold on...

02:22 :01 911 Operator #1 ...(unintelligible) who was on (unintelligible)...

02:2 2:26 911 Operator #2 ...it was (unintelligible) the white phone...

02:23 :08 Darlie Routier ...hold on...

02:2 5:26 911 Operator #2 ...they were wondering when we need to dispatch ...so I sent a double team...

02:2 5:wolfhoundour: Darlie Routier ...oh my God ...oh my God...

02:2 8:08 911 Operator #1 ...ok ...thanks...

02 :28:21 Darlie Routier ...oh my God...

02: 29:20 SOUND ...(unintelligible)...

02 :30:01 Darlie Routier ...oh my God...

02:3 0:20 911 Operator #1 ...ma'am...

02:3 1:06 RADIO ...(unintelligible)...

02:3 1:14 911 Operator #1 ...who's there with you...

02:3 2:15 Darlie Routier ...Karen ...(unintelligible)...

02:3 3:15 911 Operator #1 ...ma'am...

02: 34:06 Darlie Routier ...what...

02:3 8:brainletbush: 911 Operator #1 ...is there anybody in the house ...besides you and your children...

02:38 :brainletbush: Darlie Routier ...no ...my husband he just ran downstairs ...he's helping me ...but they're dying ...oh my God ...they're dead...

02:43 :24 911 Operator #1 ...ok ...ok ...how many little boys ...is it two boys...

02:46 :06 Darin Routier ...(unintelligible)...

02:46 :25 Darlie Routier ...there's two of 'em ...there's two...

02:48 :18 RADIO ...what's the cross street on that address on Eagle...

02:50 :15 Darlie Routier ...oh my God ...who would do this...

02:5 3:13 911 Operator #1 ...(unintelligible) listen to me ...calm down ...(unintelligible)...

02:5 3:21 Darlie Routier ...I feel really bad ...I think I'm dying...

02:5 5:06 RADIO ...228...

02:5 6:06 911 Operator #1 ...go ahead...

02:5 8:12 RADIO ...(unintelligible) address again (unintelligible)...

02: 59:12 RADIO ...(unintelligible)...

02:5 9:22 Darlie Routier ...when are they going to be here...

03:00 :22 911 Operator #1 ...5801 Eagle Drive ...5801 Eagle Drive...

03:0 3:wolfhoundour: Darlie Routier ...when are they going to be here...

03: 03:29 911 Operator #1 ...going to be a stabbing...

03:0 5:20 Darlie Routier ...when are they going to be here...

03: 06:20 911 Operator #1 ...ma'am ...they're on their way...

03:0 8:00 RADIO ...(unintelligible)...

03:0 8:08 Darlie Routier ...I gotta just sit here forever ...oh my God...

03:1 1:14 911 Operator #1 ...2:35...

03:1 2:05 Darie Routier ...who would do this ...who would do this...

03:1 3:09 Darin Routier ...(unintelligible)...

03:1 4:26 911 Operator #1 ...(sounds of typing on computer keyboard)...

03:1 6:08 911 Operator #1 ...ma'am ...how old are your boys...

03:18 :20 Darin Routier ...what...

03:1 9:03 911 Operator #1 ...how old are your boys...

03:20 :04 RADIO ...(unintelligible)...

03:2 0:21 911 Operator #1 ...no...

03:21 :01 Darlie Routier ...seven and five...

03:2 2:17 911 Operator #1 ...ok...

03:2 3:08 Darlie Routier ...oh my God ...oh my God ...oh ...he's dead...

03:2 9:02 911 Operator #1 ...calm down ...can you...

03:2 9:03 Darlie Routier ...oh God ...Devon no ...oh my God...

03:3 0:27 SOUND ...(dog barking)...

03:3 5:02 911 Operator #1 ...is your name Darlie...

03:36 : Darlie Routier ...yes...

03:36:26 911 Operator #1 ...this is her...

03:3 7:09 911 Operator #1 ...is your husband's name Darin...

03: 38:22 Darlie Routier ...yes ...please hurry ...God they're taking forever...

03:4 1:20 911 Operator #1 ...there's nobody in your house ...there was ...was...

03:4 4:05 911 Operator #1 ...you don't know who did this...

03:4 5:19 Police Officer ...look for a rag...

03:4 6:brainletbush: Darlie Routier ...they killed our babies...

03:4 8:03 Police Officer ...lay down ...ok ...just sit down ...(unintelligible)

03:51 :brainletbush: 911 Operator #1 ...(sounds of typing on computer keyboard)...

03:5 2:13 Darlie Routier ...no ...he ran out ...uh ...they ran out in the garage ...I was sleeping...

03:54 :09 911 Operator #1 ...(unintelligible)...

03:5 6:19 Darlie Routier ...my babies over here already cut ...can I (unintelligible)...

03:5 9:29 Darin Routier ...(unintelligible) phone is right there...

04:0 1:wolfhoundour: Darlie Routier ...(unintelligible)...

04:0 3:01 RADIO ...(unintelligible)...

04: 05:02 Darlie Routier ...ya'll look out in the garage ...look out in the garage ...they left a knife laying on...

04:0 8:21 RADIO ...(unintelligible)...

04:0 9:19 911 Operator #1 ...there's a knife ...don't touch anything...

04:11: 18 Darlie Routier ...I already touched it and picked it up...

04:1 2:05 RADIO ...10-4...

04:1 5:20 911 Operator #1 ...who's out there ...is anybody out there...

04 :16:07 Police Officer ...(unintelligible)...

04:1 7:06 Darlie Routier ...I don't know ...I was sleeping...

04: 18:14 911 Operator #1 ...ok ma'am ...listen ...there's a police officer at your front door ...is your front door unlocked...

04:2 2:brainletbush: RADIO ...(unintelligible)...

04: 22:15 Darlie Routier ...yes ma'am ...but where's the ambulance...

04:2 4:21 911 Operator #1 ...ok...

04:2 4:23 Darlie Routier ...they're barely breathing...

04:26 :17 Darlie Routier ...if they don't get it here they're gonna be dead ...my God they're (unintelligible) ...hurry ...please hurry...

04:31 :13 911 Operator #1 ...ok ...they're ...they're...

04:32 :18 Police Officer ...what about you...

04:33 :06 911 Operator #1 ...is 82 out on Eagle...

04:34 :18 Darlie Routier ...huh...

04:3 5:12 Darin Routier ...they took (unintelligible) ...they ran (unintelligible)...

04:3 6:wolfhoundour: 911 Operator #2 ...(unintelligible)...

04:3 7:08 Darlie Routier ...we're at Eagle ...5801 Eagle ...my God and hurry...

04:41 :03 RADIO ...(unintelligible)...

04:41 :22 911 Operator #1 ...82 ...are you out...

04:42:2 5 Police Officer ...nothing's gone Mrs. Routier...

04:44 :10 Darlie Routier ...oh my God ...oh my God ...why would they do this...

04:48 :03 RADIO ...(unintelligible) to advise (unintelligible) 200...

04:50: 18 Police Officer ...(unintelligible) the problem Mrs. Routier...

04:50 :21 911 Operator #1 ...what'd he say...

04:51 :29 Darlie Routier ...why would they do this...

04:53 :08 Darlie Routier ...I'm (unintelligible)...

04:54 :07 911 Operator #1 ...ok ...listen ma'am ...need to ...need to let the officers in the front door ...ok...

04:59 :brainletbush: Darlie Routier ...what...

05:00 :04 911 Operator #1 ...ma'am..

05:00 :22 Darlie Routier ...what ...what...

05:01 :15 911 Operator #1 ...need to let the police officers in the front door...

05:04 :21 Darlie Routier ...(unintelligible) his knife was lying over there and I already picked it up...

05:08 :19 911 Operator #1 ...ok ...it's alright ...it's ok...

05:09 :20 Darlie Routier ...God ...I bet if we could have gotten the prints maybe ...maybe...

05:13 :18 Police Officer ...(unintelligible)...

05:14 :18 RADIO ...82 ...we'll be (unintelligible)...

05:17 :12 Darlie Routier ...ok ...it'll be...

05:18 :08 911 Operator #1 ...ma'am ...hang on ...hang on a second...

05:19 :09 Darlie Routier ...somebody who did it intentionally walked in here and did it Darin...

05:20 :19 911 Operator #1 ...82 ...10-9...

05:21 :23 RADIO ...(unintelligible)...

05:22 :wolfhoundour: 911 Operator #1 ...received...

05:23 :05 Darlie Routier ...there's nothing touched...

05:24 :12 911 Operator #1 ...ok ma'am...

05:25 :13 Darlie Routier ...there's nothing touched...

05:26 :20 RADIO ...(unintelligible)...

05:wolfhoundour: :00 Darlie Routier ...oh my God...

05:29 :08 Police Officer ...(unintelligible)...

05:29 :23 RADIO ...received...

05:31 :19 RADIO ...(unintelligible)...

05:33 :25 911 Operator #1 ...ma'am ...is the police officer there...

05:35 :14 Darlie Routier ...yes (unintelligible)...

05: 35 :23 911 Operator #1 ...ok ...go talk to him ...ok...

05: 38 :03 RADIO ...(unintelligible)...

Total length of tape is 5: 44 :wolfhoundour:

YES I KNOW THE TIME STAMPS ARE FUCKED AND HAVE EMOJIS IN THEM. I DO NOT CARE, THE TIME ARE IRRELEVANT, JUST FOLLOW ALONG WITH THE VIDEO.


anyways.... CHILD WARNING VVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVVV

--

--

--

--

--

--

--


Images of the boys (I don't have any idea who is who, but it looks like there is only one boy in these images):

--

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/w1ber5yv.jpg

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/sr0ekchp.jpg

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/yqrklr4.jpg

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/fo4duo6.jpg

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/dv5r7fhx.jpg


Crime Scene Photos:

--

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/bzc4kma1.jpg

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/bdyszl8k.jpg

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/nxrxnszh.jpg

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/r03dx66w.jpg

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/chcuax6p.jpg

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/d9vqz0i3.jpg

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/cns2l7y0.jpg

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/2q47mc1w.jpg

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/pqw1i1bd.jpg

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/4znoerxz.jpg

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/dfxkfh6o.jpg

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/db9vt95u.jpg

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/jjvqgvz5.jpg

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/deiw0dzv.jpg

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/xxdff7j0.jpg

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/y8sqw6ng.jpg

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/s5yxy7ia.jpg

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/iao4khle.jpg


Harm that was done to Darlie by Darlie:

--

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/bboi1qe5.jpg

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/lxio4jr.jpg

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/bdcbijhq.jpg

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/gk0dqqs1.jpg

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/04kyzg0.jpg

https://pomf2.lain.la/f/0ury6f7f.jpg


Motive:

--

The prosecution argued that Darlie Routier murdered her sons due to the family's financial struggles. Despite being a full-time homemaker, her husband Darin, a small business owner, had a relatively high income. In a subsequent interview with Joe Munoz of KXAS Channel 5 in Dallas-Fort Worth, Darin Routier referred to their lifestyle as "living large" just days after the tragic deaths. The family resided in a two-story home in a middle-class neighborhood, drove a mid-sized SUV, and owned a used Jaguar automobile and a used boat.

According to the prosecutors, Darlie Routier was portrayed as a pampered and materialistic woman facing substantial debt, declining credit ratings, and limited funds in the bank. Allegedly fearing the imminent end of her middle-class lifestyle, she was accused of resorting to the drastic measure of murdering her sons.


Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas:

--

ONLY PARTS DUE TO GOING OVER 100K LIMIT:

Routier v. State

Darlie Lynn ROUTIER, Appellant,

v.

The STATE of Texas.

No. 72795.

May 21, 2003

J. Stephen Cooper, Dallas, for Appellant.John R. Rolater, Jr., Asst. DA, Dallas, Matthew Paul, State's Attorney, Austin, for State.

The appellant was convicted of the capital murder of a child under six years of age.  Tex. Penal Code § 19.03(a)(8).   Pursuant to the jury's answers to the special issues set forth in Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 37.071, sections 2(b) and 2(e), the trial judge sentenced appellant to death.  Tex.Code Crim. Proc. art. 37.071, § 2(g).  Direct appeal to this Court is automatic.  Tex.Code Crim. Proc. art. 37.071, § 2(h).  The appellant raises fourteen points of error.   We shall affirm.

The evidence that supports the verdict shows that the appellant stabbed and killed her two sons, Damon and Devon,1 while her husband and infant son were asleep upstairs in the house.   The appellant does not challenge the legal or factual sufficiency of the evidence to support her conviction, and therefore, it is not necessary to set out the evidence in detail.

I. Claims Regarding the Record

In her brief, the appellant makes several claims regarding the preparation and certification of the reporter's record in addition to claims regarding her trial.   We will address claims dealing with the accuracy of the record before dealing with the appellant's claims regarding her trial.   Specifically, the appellant complains that she is entitled to a new trial because of problems with the reporter's record.   She argues that, at a minimum, she is entitled to a hearing before the record can be used to decide her appeal.   A review of the facts pertaining to these points of error is necessary.

The appellant's trial took place in January 1997.   The certified court reporter, Sandra Halsey, took stenographic notes during the trial.   Halsey simultaneously typed notes of the proceedings onto paper strips (“notes”) and onto computer edit disks (“disks”) that automatically translated the stenographic symbols into English.   In April 1998, under an order of contempt issued by this Court the month before,2 Halsey prepared, certified, and filed the original reporter's record in the case (“Halsey record”).

In a motion to correct and clarify Halsey's record, filed October 13, 1998, the appellant raised the first dispute about the accuracy of the record.   An excerpt of the record that had been read to the jury did not match the corresponding portion of the Halsey record.   Also, counsel noted discrepancies about who was present during the trial and when.   The next day this Court granted the appellant's motion and ordered Halsey to prepare, certify, and file a supplemental reporter's record containing any omitted items.   We also ordered the trial court 3 to resolve any dispute raised in the appellant's motion and to ensure that the reporter's record conformed to what occurred at trial.

The trial court conducted a hearing and decided that the entire record had to be reviewed to comply with this Court's October 14, 1998 order.   In a hearing held October 30, 1998, pursuant to our order, Halsey testified that she made audiotape recordings (“tapes”) in addition to the notes and disks during the trial.   Halsey claimed that the audiotape recorder worked during only the voir dire portion of the trial.   The trial court ordered Halsey to produce her notes, disks, and tapes from the trial.   The trial court also ordered her to conduct a review of the record and make note of any problems she found or corrections she made.

At a hearing held on November 4, 1998, the trial court appointed three certified court reporters, Tommy Mullins, Judy Miller, and Jerry Calloway (“the experts”), to perform a review and to compare the notes and disks to Halsey's record to determine whether Halsey's record could be certified.

Although Halsey had told the trial court and the experts that she possessed no tapes from the guilt and punishment phases of the trial, on November 12, 1998, she told prosecutor Lindsey Roberts and appellant's counsel Stephen Cooper that tapes from those phases of the trial did exist.   According to a stipulation read into the record, she went with Roberts to retrieve the tapes from a storage facility in Plano.   Halsey told Roberts that the tapes she produced were from the Routier trial.   These tapes were produced during the hearing in the trial court on November 13, 1998.   The appellant expressed concern about the authenticity of the tapes.   The trial court received the tapes with the understanding that the question of their authenticity would be subject to further review.

Also during the hearing on November 13, the experts testified that they performed their review by comparing a total of twelve random pages from four of the ten volumes of Halsey's record of the trial with the corresponding notes and disks.   On each of the four pages, the experts found several differences between what was in the notes and what was on the pages from the record.   They concluded that the only way to account for so many differences between the notes and Halsey's record is that someone listened to tapes from the trial and made changes based on the tapes.4

Halsey's daughter and transcription scopist,5 Suzy Crowley, testified that Halsey gave her tapes of the guilt and punishment phases of trial.   Crowley stated that she used the tapes to make permanent changes to the English translation of the original proceedings on the disks.   She testified that the tapes presented by Roberts looked similar to the ones she had used and that they had labels on them that identified them as being from the Routier trial.   Scopist Michelle Reynolds reviewed and edited the voir dire portion of the trial.

Halsey did not testify at the hearing on November 13, 1998.   The trial court appointed counsel for her.   At the conclusion of the hearing, the trial court rescinded its prior order of October 30, 1998, to have Halsey review her record and ordered her to cease any proceedings regarding the record.   The trial court said it would appoint a certified reporter, agreeable to both the State and the appellant, to review Halsey's record and determine whether it could be made to conform to what occurred at trial.

On November 19, 1998, the trial court appointed Susan Simmons, a certified court reporter for the United States District Court in Tyler, to perform a review of the guilt and punishment phases of the record, as well as the pretrial hearings.6  The parties and the experts all agreed that Simmons was qualified and competent to perform the review.   During the hearing, the appellant's counsel explained that he was not sure if it was legally permissible or even possible to certify the record.   He reserved the right to offer evidence on this point at a later time.   Halsey appeared with her attorney that day.   To comply with a subpoena duces tecum requesting all materials regarding the appellant's trial, her attorney turned over the notes and disks for the entire trial.   Halsey refused to testify, however, and asserted her Fifth Amendment privilege.

On December 9, 1998, Halsey's attorney produced twelve more tapes, which he claimed were additional tapes from the trial.   Halsey was then relieved of her duties as the official court reporter in this case.   The trial court ordered Halsey to continue to look for more tapes.

On April 1, 1999, the trial court conducted a hearing during which Simmons testified that she had revised the Halsey record of the guilt and punishment phases of the appellant's trial.   Simmons submitted the revised record (“Simmons record”) and her red-lined copy of the Halsey record that reflected all of the changes that she had made.   Counsel for the appellant and the State were not permitted to question Simmons directly.7  Before the hearing, the trial court provided to the parties the questions it would ask Simmons.   The parties were permitted to submit written questions to the trial court, and the trial court read the questions that it concluded were relevant and not repetitive.   The trial court instructed the parties not to object to questions during the testimony;  they were directed to submit those objections before the next hearing.   The trial court stated that it would also afford the parties an opportunity to submit a bill of exceptions.   The parties were given a break during the testimony to submit further questions based on the testimony that had already been heard.

Simmons testified about the standard procedures for preparing a record of proceedings.   First, during the proceedings, the certified court reporter writes on a machine notes of what occurs.   The notes include a list of the people who are present, the date of the proceedings, the name of the proceedings, the testimony taken, and the list of exhibits.   The machine simultaneously prints the symbols onto the notes and records the symbols onto a disk or hard drive.   The symbols on the notes cannot be read or deciphered by someone without some training as a court reporter or scopist.   The notes are labeled with the date and subject matter.   It is common for the court reporter to use an audiotape recorder as a backup.   Generally, the recorder is connected to the microphones on the witness stand, the attorneys' tables, and the judge's bench.

Simmons testified that after the proceedings are over, the court reporter takes the disk to a computer and uses software, to which the reporter's personal dictionary has been added.   The dictionary in the software produces an English translation of the symbols.   The computer produces a split screen on the monitor, which shows the symbols on one side and the English translation on the other side.   The English translation will show some “untranslates,” which are symbols that the software does not recognize.   After the reporter enters the correct word, the symbol for the word and its translation are added to the reporter's personal dictionary.

According to Simmons's testimony, if the reporter uses a scopist, and most do, the translation is put on a duplicate disk, which is given to a scopist along with the backup tapes.   The scopist performs the first edit.   Ordinarily, the scopist loads the disk and listens to the tapes going line-by-line checking for corrections and unrecognized words.   Then this edited version is saved on another disk to leave intact the original English translation that was produced at trial,8 and all the materials are returned to the reporter.

Simmons indicated that the reporter, after receiving the materials from the scopist, proofreads either the hard copy of the new translation or the on-screen copy while listening to the tapes.   Then the reporter proofreads the record one more time, checks for spelling errors, and prints and certifies the record.

Simmons testified about her work in the appellant's case.   She explained that she followed the instructions in the trial court's order.   The trial court had not ordered Simmons to certify the record;  she was ordered to review the record from the guilt and punishment phases of the trial and to certify it if possible.   She possessed the Halsey record, the disks, tapes, notes, and some handwritten notations by Halsey.   She followed the procedure that is ordinarily employed when a court reporter is unable to produce the record because of either death or disability.

Simmons testified that she first went through the notes and the tapes to be sure that she had them for each volume of the Halsey record she had been assigned.   She said that it appeared that she had been provided with a complete set of materials for the guilt and punishment phases of the trial.   She said it was possible to create a certifiable record based on the materials provided.   The notes prepared on the machine appeared to be complete with no gaps in the proceedings and within the range of competent reporting.   The disks were in useable form and appeared to be complete.   The tapes were audible and seemed to be complete with no discernible gaps or alterations.

Simmons testified that she started the review process by listening to the tapes while going through the Halsey record line-by-line.   She marked the corrections onto her copy of the Halsey record.   When she had questions, she flipped to the appropriate portion of the notes.   She did not perform a systematic review of the notes.   She was able to identify witnesses when they stated their names at the beginning of their testimony.   If a voice was not identified in this manner, she used the notes, which contained symbols identifying the speakers.

Simmons then took the marked version of the Halsey record and the disks to her scopist.   The scopist copied each disk onto her hard drive.   Then she made the changes marked in pen and saved the files on new disks so that there would be no alteration of the disks provided by Halsey.   The scopist printed a hard copy of the changes.   Simmons proofread the hard-copy by doing a page-by-page comparison of the changes.

This procedure was followed until all of the volumes for the guilt and punishment phases were completed.   Then Simmons prepared a master index, exhibit index, and witness index, which was compared to the scopist's list.   Three hard copies of the final edited version (“Simmons record”) were produced along with disks with a universal translation.9

Simmons testified that she believed that Halsey used more than one scopist to create the record.   It is standard practice for the reporter who actually heard the trial to review the changes a scopist makes using the tapes.   It is normal for the final record to be different in some respects from the unedited notes.   The purpose of editing the notes is to make them reflect, as nearly as possible, what happened at trial.   Simmons said that the Halsey record was inaccurate and poorly prepared.   She opined that the deficiencies in the Halsey record were based on a lack of proper editing.   Simmons did not attend any of the proceedings in Kerrville and had no personal knowledge of what happened at trial.   But Simmons testified that she believed, based on the materials provided and her expertise, she was able to render a complete and accurate record that conforms to what occurred at trial.   She said that, if the materials did not contain a complete and accurate account of the proceedings, then the Simmons record could suffer from the same flaws.   But she believed that the materials provided accurate information for preparing the record.   Simmons has reconstructed trial records in other cases, and she was able to certify records in those cases.   In her expert opinion, the record as prepared by her had been made to conform to what happened at trial to ninety-five percent accuracy.

On April 26, 1999, the Court of Criminal Appeals ordered the trial court to ensure that the entire record, including voir dire and pretrial proceedings, conformed to what happened at trial.   We ordered the trial court to independently review other parts of the record in the same manner as it had the guilt and punishment phases.   On May 4, 1999, the trial court appointed Simmons and her scopist to prepare the remaining portions of the record.

On October 14, 1999, a hearing was held to receive the remaining portions of the record that Simmons had completed.   She testified that the tapes were audible and seemed to have no gaps or alterations, the disks for the volumes-other than Volume 16-were useable, and the notes-although there were mistakes-could be used to the extent she needed them.   She testified that, once again, she was able to certify that the record conformed to what occurred at trial.   She testified that she used the same procedures used to complete the guilt and punishment phases of the record, with one exception.   For Volume 16, there was no disk.   Therefore, Simmons proofread the hard copy of the Halsey record with the tapes and had her scopist retype the entire volume.

Later, the parties and the trial court became aware that Volumes 10 and 11 had not been sent to Simmons for preparation.   The materials were then sent to Simmons, and she was ordered to review the materials in the same manner as she had reviewed the other portions of the trial.   The trial court ordered Simmons to revise and certify a record if possible.10

At a hearing on January 28, 2000, Simmons testified that she followed the same procedure for preparing and certifying the record, except for the first 54 pages of Volume 10.11  These pages contained the proceedings for October 21, 1996.   For those 54 pages, Simmons had the Halsey record, the notes, and the disk, but no tape.   Going line-by-line, she compared the Halsey record with the notes taken on the day the proceedings occurred.   She noted that there did not appear to be any gaps in the notes and that they were in good and useable form.   Simmons refused to certify these pages, however.   She explained that, based on the portions of the record she had prepared already and the state of the Halsey record, she was not comfortable certifying the first 54 pages without a tape to compare to the Halsey record.   She said that her record for the first 54 pages of Volume 10 is an accurate transcription of Halsey's notes.   Her decision not to certify was based on the following facts:  she was not present at trial;  she had no tape to use as a backup;  and her review of the rest of the record indicated that she needed a tape to correct the record because it had been edited so poorly.

Simmons testified that on the tape for the afternoon session of court on October 21, 1996, in a conversation between Halsey and someone from the Sheriff's Department, Halsey mentioned that she needed some batteries.12  Simmons believed that this might explain the absence of a tape for the morning session.   Simmons believed, however, that a tape existed for the morning session because there were words that appeared in the Halsey record that did not appear in the notes.   At the conclusion of the hearing, the trial court announced that it would give the parties 120 days in which to review the entire record and make objections.

On February 9, 2000, the trial court issued an order stating that Volumes 10 and 11 of the Simmons record should replace the same volumes of the Halsey record because the Halsey record did not conform to what occurred at trial.   The Court, by agreement of the parties, gave the parties until March 6, 2000, to file objections to the Simmons record.

On March 2, 2000, the appellant filed written objections to the Simmons record and a written request for a hearing to resolve factual disputes about the record.   The State's response to the appellant's written objections was filed April 28, 2000.   On September 1, 2000, the trial court scheduled a hearing on the appellant's objections to the record to take place on September 8, 2000.   The appellant's attorney subpoenaed several witnesses, including Judy Miller, Mary Docklar, Jerry Calloway, Doug Mulder, Jeff Crilley, Lindsey Roberts, Toby Shook, and Greg Davis.

On September 7, 2000, the trial court issued findings on the record and an order cancelling the hearing scheduled for the next day.   The findings say that the trial court reviewed the orders issued by the Court of Criminal Appeals, the record from all hearings held to comply with the orders issued by the Court of Criminal Appeals, the findings and orders of the trial court, the appellant's objections to the record, and the State's response.   The trial court found that the appellant's objections were clear and concise and would apprise the Court of Criminal Appeals of the appellant's concerns about the record.   It found that the appellant's motions to suppress evidence in the proceedings on the record were beyond the scope of the orders of the Court of Criminal Appeals.   It also found that an evidentiary hearing as requested by the appellant was not necessary to comply with the orders of the Court of Criminal Appeals, the orders had been complied with, and that it would not hold any other hearings unless the Court of Criminal Appeals so ordered.

In response to the trial court's order cancelling the hearing, the appellant filed her Formal Bill of Exception No. 1 and a Motion for a Hearing to Make an Offer of Proof on September 25, 2000.

The trial court responded with a finding that it no longer had jurisdiction of the case.   The court forwarded the appellant's pleadings to the Court of Criminal Appeals without taking action.


Some articles about Darlie:

Routier v. State

Darlie Lynn ROUTIER, Appellant,

v.

The STATE of Texas.

No. 72795.

May 21, 2003

J. Stephen Cooper, Dallas, for Appellant.John R. Rolater, Jr., Asst. DA, Dallas, Matthew Paul, State's Attorney, Austin, for State.

The appellant was convicted of the capital murder of a child under six years of age.  Tex. Penal Code § 19.03(a)(8).   Pursuant to the jury's answers to the special issues set forth in Texas Code of Criminal Procedure article 37.071, sections 2(b) and 2(e), the trial judge sentenced appellant to death.  Tex.Code Crim. Proc. art. 37.071, § 2(g).  Direct appeal to this Court is automatic.  Tex.Code Crim. Proc. art. 37.071, § 2(h).  The appellant raises fourteen points of error.   We shall affirm.

The evidence that supports the verdict shows that the appellant stabbed and killed her two sons, Damon and Devon,1 while her husband and infant son were asleep upstairs in the house.   The appellant does not challenge the legal or factual sufficiency of the evidence to support her conviction, and therefore, it is not necessary to set out the evidence in detail.

I. Claims Regarding the Record

In her brief, the appellant makes several claims regarding the preparation and certification of the reporter's record in addition to claims regarding her trial.   We will address claims dealing with the accuracy of the record before dealing with the appellant's claims regarding her trial.   Specifically, the appellant complains that she is entitled to a new trial because of problems with the reporter's record.   She argues that, at a minimum, she is entitled to a hearing before the record can be used to decide her appeal.   A review of the facts pertaining to these points of error is necessary.

The appellant's trial took place in January 1997.   The certified court reporter, Sandra Halsey, took stenographic notes during the trial.   Halsey simultaneously typed notes of the proceedings onto paper strips (“notes”) and onto computer edit disks (“disks”) that automatically translated the stenographic symbols into English.   In April 1998, under an order of contempt issued by this Court the month before,2 Halsey prepared, certified, and filed the original reporter's record in the case (“Halsey record”).

In a motion to correct and clarify Halsey's record, filed October 13, 1998, the appellant raised the first dispute about the accuracy of the record.   An excerpt of the record that had been read to the jury did not match the corresponding portion of the Halsey record.   Also, counsel noted discrepancies about who was present during the trial and when.   The next day this Court granted the appellant's motion and ordered Halsey to prepare, certify, and file a supplemental reporter's record containing any omitted items.   We also ordered the trial court 3 to resolve any dispute raised in the appellant's motion and to ensure that the reporter's record conformed to what occurred at trial.

The trial court conducted a hearing and decided that the entire record had to be reviewed to comply with this Court's October 14, 1998 order.   In a hearing held October 30, 1998, pursuant to our order, Halsey testified that she made audiotape recordings (“tapes”) in addition to the notes and disks during the trial.   Halsey claimed that the audiotape recorder worked during only the voir dire portion of the trial.   The trial court ordered Halsey to produce her notes, disks, and tapes from the trial.   The trial court also ordered her to conduct a review of the record and make note of any problems she found or corrections she made.

At a hearing held on November 4, 1998, the trial court appointed three certified court reporters, Tommy Mullins, Judy Miller, and Jerry Calloway (“the experts”), to perform a review and to compare the notes and disks to Halsey's record to determine whether Halsey's record could be certified.

Although Halsey had told the trial court and the experts that she possessed no tapes from the guilt and punishment phases of the trial, on November 12, 1998, she told prosecutor Lindsey Roberts and appellant's counsel Stephen Cooper that tapes from those phases of the trial did exist.   According to a stipulation read into the record, she went with Roberts to retrieve the tapes from a storage facility in Plano.   Halsey told Roberts that the tapes she produced were from the Routier trial.   These tapes were produced during the hearing in the trial court on November 13, 1998.   The appellant expressed concern about the authenticity of the tapes.   The trial court received the tapes with the understanding that the question of their authenticity would be subject to further review.

Also during the hearing on November 13, the experts testified that they performed their review by comparing a total of twelve random pages from four of the ten volumes of Halsey's record of the trial with the corresponding notes and disks.   On each of the four pages, the experts found several differences between what was in the notes and what was on the pages from the record.   They concluded that the only way to account for so many differences between the notes and Halsey's record is that someone listened to tapes from the trial and made changes based on the tapes.4

Halsey's daughter and transcription scopist,5 Suzy Crowley, testified that Halsey gave her tapes of the guilt and punishment phases of trial.   Crowley stated that she used the tapes to make permanent changes to the English translation of the original proceedings on the disks.   She testified that the tapes presented by Roberts looked similar to the ones she had used and that they had labels on them that identified them as being from the Routier trial.   Scopist Michelle Reynolds reviewed and edited the voir dire portion of the trial.

Halsey did not testify at the hearing on November 13, 1998.   The trial court appointed counsel for her.   At the conclusion of the hearing, the trial court rescinded its prior order of October 30, 1998, to have Halsey review her record and ordered her to cease any proceedings regarding the record.   The trial court said it would appoint a certified reporter, agreeable to both the State and the appellant, to review Halsey's record and determine whether it could be made to conform to what occurred at trial.

On November 19, 1998, the trial court appointed Susan Simmons, a certified court reporter for the United States District Court in Tyler, to perform a review of the guilt and punishment phases of the record, as well as the pretrial hearings.6  The parties and the experts all agreed that Simmons was qualified and competent to perform the review.   During the hearing, the appellant's counsel explained that he was not sure if it was legally permissible or even possible to certify the record.   He reserved the right to offer evidence on this point at a later time.   Halsey appeared with her attorney that day.   To comply with a subpoena duces tecum requesting all materials regarding the appellant's trial, her attorney turned over the notes and disks for the entire trial.   Halsey refused to testify, however, and asserted her Fifth Amendment privilege.

On December 9, 1998, Halsey's attorney produced twelve more tapes, which he claimed were additional tapes from the trial.   Halsey was then relieved of her duties as the official court reporter in this case.   The trial court ordered Halsey to continue to look for more tapes.

On April 1, 1999, the trial court conducted a hearing during which Simmons testified that she had revised the Halsey record of the guilt and punishment phases of the appellant's trial.   Simmons submitted the revised record (“Simmons record”) and her red-lined copy of the Halsey record that reflected all of the changes that she had made.   Counsel for the appellant and the State were not permitted to question Simmons directly.7  Before the hearing, the trial court provided to the parties the questions it would ask Simmons.   The parties were permitted to submit written questions to the trial court, and the trial court read the questions that it concluded were relevant and not repetitive.   The trial court instructed the parties not to object to questions during the testimony;  they were directed to submit those objections before the next hearing.   The trial court stated that it would also afford the parties an opportunity to submit a bill of exceptions.   The parties were given a break during the testimony to submit further questions based on the testimony that had already been heard.

Simmons testified about the standard procedures for preparing a record of proceedings.   First, during the proceedings, the certified court reporter writes on a machine notes of what occurs.   The notes include a list of the people who are present, the date of the proceedings, the name of the proceedings, the testimony taken, and the list of exhibits.   The machine simultaneously prints the symbols onto the notes and records the symbols onto a disk or hard drive.   The symbols on the notes cannot be read or deciphered by someone without some training as a court reporter or scopist.   The notes are labeled with the date and subject matter.   It is common for the court reporter to use an audiotape recorder as a backup.   Generally, the recorder is connected to the microphones on the witness stand, the attorneys' tables, and the judge's bench.

Simmons testified that after the proceedings are over, the court reporter takes the disk to a computer and uses software, to which the reporter's personal dictionary has been added.   The dictionary in the software produces an English translation of the symbols.   The computer produces a split screen on the monitor, which shows the symbols on one side and the English translation on the other side.   The English translation will show some “untranslates,” which are symbols that the software does not recognize.   After the reporter enters the correct word, the symbol for the word and its translation are added to the reporter's personal dictionary.

According to Simmons's testimony, if the reporter uses a scopist, and most do, the translation is put on a duplicate disk, which is given to a scopist along with the backup tapes.   The scopist performs the first edit.   Ordinarily, the scopist loads the disk and listens to the tapes going line-by-line checking for corrections and unrecognized words.   Then this edited version is saved on another disk to leave intact the original English translation that was produced at trial,8 and all the materials are returned to the reporter.

Simmons indicated that the reporter, after receiving the materials from the scopist, proofreads either the hard copy of the new translation or the on-screen copy while listening to the tapes.   Then the reporter proofreads the record one more time, checks for spelling errors, and prints and certifies the record.

Simmons testified about her work in the appellant's case.   She explained that she followed the instructions in the trial court's order.   The trial court had not ordered Simmons to certify the record;  she was ordered to review the record from the guilt and punishment phases of the trial and to certify it if possible.   She possessed the Halsey record, the disks, tapes, notes, and some handwritten notations by Halsey.   She followed the procedure that is ordinarily employed when a court reporter is unable to produce the record because of either death or disability.

Simmons testified that she first went through the notes and the tapes to be sure that she had them for each volume of the Halsey record she had been assigned.   She said that it appeared that she had been provided with a complete set of materials for the guilt and punishment phases of the trial.   She said it was possible to create a certifiable record based on the materials provided.   The notes prepared on the machine appeared to be complete with no gaps in the proceedings and within the range of competent reporting.   The disks were in useable form and appeared to be complete.   The tapes were audible and seemed to be complete with no discernible gaps or alterations.

Simmons testified that she started the review process by listening to the tapes while going through the Halsey record line-by-line.   She marked the corrections onto her copy of the Halsey record.   When she had questions, she flipped to the appropriate portion of the notes.   She did not perform a systematic review of the notes.   She was able to identify witnesses when they stated their names at the beginning of their testimony.   If a voice was not identified in this manner, she used the notes, which contained symbols identifying the speakers.

Simmons then took the marked version of the Halsey record and the disks to her scopist.   The scopist copied each disk onto her hard drive.   Then she made the changes marked in pen and saved the files on new disks so that there would be no alteration of the disks provided by Halsey.   The scopist printed a hard copy of the changes.   Simmons proofread the hard-copy by doing a page-by-page comparison of the changes.

This procedure was followed until all of the volumes for the guilt and punishment phases were completed.   Then Simmons prepared a master index, exhibit index, and witness index, which was compared to the scopist's list.   Three hard copies of the final edited version (“Simmons record”) were produced along with disks with a universal translation.9

Simmons testified that she believed that Halsey used more than one scopist to create the record.   It is standard practice for the reporter who actually heard the trial to review the changes a scopist makes using the tapes.   It is normal for the final record to be different in some respects from the unedited notes.   The purpose of editing the notes is to make them reflect, as nearly as possible, what happened at trial.   Simmons said that the Halsey record was inaccurate and poorly prepared.   She opined that the deficiencies in the Halsey record were based on a lack of proper editing.   Simmons did not attend any of the proceedings in Kerrville and had no personal knowledge of what happened at trial.   But Simmons testified that she believed, based on the materials provided and her expertise, she was able to render a complete and accurate record that conforms to what occurred at trial.   She said that, if the materials did not contain a complete and accurate account of the proceedings, then the Simmons record could suffer from the same flaws.   But she believed that the materials provided accurate information for preparing the record.   Simmons has reconstructed trial records in other cases, and she was able to certify records in those cases.   In her expert opinion, the record as prepared by her had been made to conform to what happened at trial to ninety-five percent accuracy.

On April 26, 1999, the Court of Criminal Appeals ordered the trial court to ensure that the entire record, including voir dire and pretrial proceedings, conformed to what happened at trial.   We ordered the trial court to independently review other parts of the record in the same manner as it had the guilt and punishment phases.   On May 4, 1999, the trial court appointed Simmons and her scopist to prepare the remaining portions of the record.

On October 14, 1999, a hearing was held to receive the remaining portions of the record that Simmons had completed.   She testified that the tapes were audible and seemed to have no gaps or alterations, the disks for the volumes-other than Volume 16-were useable, and the notes-although there were mistakes-could be used to the extent she needed them.   She testified that, once again, she was able to certify that the record conformed to what occurred at trial.   She testified that she used the same procedures used to complete the guilt and punishment phases of the record, with one exception.   For Volume 16, there was no disk.   Therefore, Simmons proofread the hard copy of the Halsey record with the tapes and had her scopist retype the entire volume.

Later, the parties and the trial court became aware that Volumes 10 and 11 had not been sent to Simmons for preparation.   The materials were then sent to Simmons, and she was ordered to review the materials in the same manner as she had reviewed the other portions of the trial.   The trial court ordered Simmons to revise and certify a record if possible.10

At a hearing on January 28, 2000, Simmons testified that she followed the same procedure for preparing and certifying the record, except for the first 54 pages of Volume 10.11  These pages contained the proceedings for October 21, 1996.   For those 54 pages, Simmons had the Halsey record, the notes, and the disk, but no tape.   Going line-by-line, she compared the Halsey record with the notes taken on the day the proceedings occurred.   She noted that there did not appear to be any gaps in the notes and that they were in good and useable form.   Simmons refused to certify these pages, however.   She explained that, based on the portions of the record she had prepared already and the state of the Halsey record, she was not comfortable certifying the first 54 pages without a tape to compare to the Halsey record.   She said that her record for the first 54 pages of Volume 10 is an accurate transcription of Halsey's notes.   Her decision not to certify was based on the following facts:  she was not present at trial;  she had no tape to use as a backup;  and her review of the rest of the record indicated that she needed a tape to correct the record because it had been edited so poorly.

Simmons testified that on the tape for the afternoon session of court on October 21, 1996, in a conversation between Halsey and someone from the Sheriff's Department, Halsey mentioned that she needed some batteries.12  Simmons believed that this might explain the absence of a tape for the morning session.   Simmons believed, however, that a tape existed for the morning session because there were words that appeared in the Halsey record that did not appear in the notes.   At the conclusion of the hearing, the trial court announced that it would give the parties 120 days in which to review the entire record and make objections.

On February 9, 2000, the trial court issued an order stating that Volumes 10 and 11 of the Simmons record should replace the same volumes of the Halsey record because the Halsey record did not conform to what occurred at trial.   The Court, by agreement of the parties, gave the parties until March 6, 2000, to file objections to the Simmons record.

On March 2, 2000, the appellant filed written objections to the Simmons record and a written request for a hearing to resolve factual disputes about the record.   The State's response to the appellant's written objections was filed April 28, 2000.   On September 1, 2000, the trial court scheduled a hearing on the appellant's objections to the record to take place on September 8, 2000.   The appellant's attorney subpoenaed several witnesses, including Judy Miller, Mary Docklar, Jerry Calloway, Doug Mulder, Jeff Crilley, Lindsey Roberts, Toby Shook, and Greg Davis.

On September 7, 2000, the trial court issued findings on the record and an order cancelling the hearing scheduled for the next day.   The findings say that the trial court reviewed the orders issued by the Court of Criminal Appeals, the record from all hearings held to comply with the orders issued by the Court of Criminal Appeals, the findings and orders of the trial court, the appellant's objections to the record, and the State's response.   The trial court found that the appellant's objections were clear and concise and would apprise the Court of Criminal Appeals of the appellant's concerns about the record.   It found that the appellant's motions to suppress evidence in the proceedings on the record were beyond the scope of the orders of the Court of Criminal Appeals.   It also found that an evidentiary hearing as requested by the appellant was not necessary to comply with the orders of the Court of Criminal Appeals, the orders had been complied with, and that it would not hold any other hearings unless the Court of Criminal Appeals so ordered.

In response to the trial court's order cancelling the hearing, the appellant filed her Formal Bill of Exception No. 1 and a Motion for a Hearing to Make an Offer of Proof on September 25, 2000.

The trial court responded with a finding that it no longer had jurisdiction of the case.   The court forwarded the appellant's pleadings to the Court of Criminal Appeals without taking action.


Routier was ultimately convicted of murdering the younger of her two sons, and was sentenced to death by lethal injection. Prosecutors did not try Routier for the death of her older son, holding his murder in reserve in the event she was acquitted in the first murder trial or her conviction was overturned on appeal, as there is no statute of limitations on any murder charge in Texas. Routier's defense attorney, Douglas Mulder, was the prosecutor responsible for the wrongful conviction and subsequent death penalty (both since overturned) of Randall Adams in 1977. The Adams case is profiled in the documentary The Thin Blue Line.

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/17059770112439747.webp

None

;-;

None
695
CHILD WARNING Just a couple hanging themselves

A news was reported that a young couple committed suicide by hanging themselves at a Tangalle hotel yesterday (23rd). The police say that the way this young couple committed suicide was recorded on a nearby CCTV camera.

Also, it has been revealed that the death of the young couple was a suicide from the post-mortem investigations conducted in this incident. It is stated that the dead young man is 22 years old and the girl is 17 years old.

It is said that there was a love relationship between this young couple and they had stayed in the hotel room the night before. It is reported that a letter written before death was found in the room.

It had been mentioned in the letter that this suicide was done by the consent of the two as their marriage was hindered due to the lack of birth certificate of the deceased young man.

https://www.dailymirror.lk/breaking_news/Teenage-couple-who-could-not-marry-over-birth-certificate-issue--committs-suicide/108-253003

None
251
Mass Shootings

If you don’t want to see the awards you can get rid of it by enabling "Poor Mode" https://watchpeopledie.tv/settings/advanced


Christchurch mosque shootings:

On 15 March 2019, two consecutive mass shootings occurred in a terrorist attack on two mosques in Christchurch, New Zealand. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christchurch_mosque_shootings

Halle synagogue shooting:

The Halle synagogue shooting occurred on 9 October 2019 in Halle, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany, and continued in nearby Landsberg. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Halle_synagogue_shooting

Buffalo shooting:

On May 14, 2022, a mass shooting occurred in Buffalo, New York, United States, at a Tops Friendly Markets supermarket in the East Side neighborhood. Ten people, all of whom were Black, were murdered and three were injured. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Buffalo_shooting

Istanbul nightclub shooting:

The Istanbul nightclub shooting was a mass shooting incident on 1 January 2017 around 01:15 am local time, in which a terrorist shot and killed 39 people and wounded 79 others at the Reina nightclub in the Ortaköy neighbourhood of Istanbul, Turkey, where hundreds had been celebrating New Year's Day. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Istanbul_nightclub_shooting

Westgate shopping mall attack:

On 21 September 2013, four masked gunmen attacked the Westgate shopping mall, an upscale mall in Nairobi, Kenya. There are conflicting reports about the number killed in the attack, since part of the mall collapsed due to a fire that started during the siege. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westgate_shopping_mall_attack

2020 Vienna attack:

The 2020 Vienna attack was a series of shootings that occurred on 2 November 2020 in Vienna, Austria. A few hours before the city was to enter a lockdown due to the COVID-19 pandemic, a lone gunman started shooting in the busy city centre. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2020_Vienna_attack

Washington DC Northwest shooting:

A shooting on Friday afternoon left at least four people wounded in Northwest Washington, D.C. The suspect, who was not identified, died of a suspected self-inflicted gunshot wound, according to officials. https://www.cbsnews.com/news/washington-dc-northwest-shooting-04-22-2022/

2016 Munich shooting:

On 22 July 2016, there was a mass shooting in the vicinity of the Olympia shopping mall in the Moosach district of Munich, Germany. An 18-year-old Iranian-German, David Sonboly, opened fire on fellow teenagers at a McDonald's restaurant before shooting at bystanders in the street outside and then in the mall itself. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2016_Munich_shooting

2019 El Paso shooting:

On August 3, 2019, a mass shooting occurred at a Walmart store in El Paso, Texas, United States. In the terrorist attack, a far-right individual killed 23 people and injured 23 others. The Federal Bureau of Investigation is investigating the shooting as an act of domestic terrorism and a hate crime. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2019_El_Paso_shooting

2017 Las Vegas shooting:

On October 1, 2017, Stephen Paddock, a 64-year-old man from Mesquite, Nevada, opened fire on the crowd attending the Route 91 Harvest music festival on the Las Vegas Strip in Nevada. From his 32nd-floor suites in the Mandalay Bay hotel, he fired more than 1,000 bullets, killing 60 people and wounding at least 413. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Las_Vegas_shooting

Poway synagogue shooting:

The Poway synagogue shooting occurred on April 27, 2019, at Chabad of Poway synagogue in Poway, California, United States, a city approximately 20 miles north of San Diego, on the last day of the Jewish Passover holiday, which fell on a Shabbat. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poway_synagogue_shooting

Charlie Hebdo shooting:

On 7 January 2015, at about 11:30 a.m. CET local time, two French Muslim terrorists and brothers, Saïd and Chérif Kouachi, forced their way into the offices of the French satirical weekly newspaper Charlie Hebdo in Paris. Armed with rifles and other weapons, they murdered 12 people and injured 11 others. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charlie_Hebdo_shooting

San Ysidro McDonald's massacre:

The San Ysidro McDonald's massacre was an act of mass murder which occurred at a McDonald's restaurant in the San Ysidro neighborhood of San Diego, California, on July 18, 1984. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/San_Ysidro_McDonald%27s_massacre

2022 Dnieper shooting:

On 27 January 2022, a mass shooting occurred at a Yuzhmash factory in Dnipro, Ukraine. Five people were killed and five others injured. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2022_Dnipro_shooting

Bucha massacre:

The Bucha massacre was the mass murder of Ukrainian civilians and prisoners of war by Russian Armed Forces during the fight for and occupation of the Ukrainian city of Bucha amid the Russian invasion of Ukraine. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bucha_massacre

None
306
CHILD WARNING EFFORTPOST (CW) Aztec High School Shooting (Effort Post)

On December 7, 2017, 21-year-old William Atchison committed a mass shooting at his former high school, killing 2 & himself.

The victims https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16996069264597623.webp

Casey Jordan Marquez aged 17 4/8/2000-12/7/2017 [left] Francisco "Paco" Fernandez aged 17 6/7/2000-12/7/2017 [right]

Both were student athletes at Aztec High School. Marquez was a cheerleader, and Fernandez, a recent transfer to the school, was an American football player.

The Perpetrator

William Edward Atchison (also known by his uncreative aliases AlGore, Vance Stone, FuckYou, MrApophis) aged 21 3/18/1996-12/7/2017

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/1699606926108288.webp https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16996069263089917.webp

William was a gas station employee and YouTuber.

Atchison was a former student of Aztec High School. On August 20 2012, Atchison dropped out after getting suspended earlier that year. His suspension came after he used a classroom whiteboard to "memorialize" the Columbine High School shooting.

Prior to December 7 2017, Atchison was a member of the Columbine High School Massacre Discussion Forum and an admin on Encyclopedia Dramatica. He also would commonly edit Wikipedia articles on mass shootings and the perpetrators. On Encyclopedia Dramatica he would also create articles on mass shooters and would regularly edit the "High Score" page, which was a leaderboard for mass shooters and their kill count.

The shooting

At approximately 8:00 a.m., Atchison entered Aztec High School disguised as a student. He carried a backpack containing a 9mm Glock 19 Gen4 semi-automatic pistol. https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16996118616409435.webp

The Glock 19 used in the shooting https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16995907769963062.webp

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16996093341865437.webp His written plan for day of the shooting (Amazing penmanship)

Recording of him scouting the school before the shooting.

Atchison opened fire in the upper level hallway of the 800-900 student occupied building.

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/1699609333696527.webp

The school custodian, Thomas "Emery" Hill, chased after Atchison, shouting, "active shooter," "lock down!" Katie Potter, a 74-year-old substitute teacher, heard the gunshots and the following loudspeaker announcement calling for a lock-down. As a substitute teacher, Ms. Potter did not have keys to the classroom, so she ushered her 17 students into the classroom office, and barricaded the door with a couch. Atchison fired multiple rounds through the office wall, as he heard police coming closer he fatally shot himself. https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16996108617025883.webp https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/1699610861506725.webp

Video of students hiding while gunshots are being heard & bullet holes shown.

Casey Marquez's body https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16996093343608701.webp https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16996093345847087.webp

Francisco Fernandez's body https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16996093348644385.webp https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16996093351528206.webp https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16996093368825095.webp https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/1699609337204589.webp

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16996104119137568.webp

William Atchison's body

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/1699609338011478.webp https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16996093383241296.webp https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/1699609339586134.webp https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16996093400953526.webp https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16996093403110363.webp https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16996093415021203.webp https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16996093420843344.webp https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16996093436752288.webp https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16996108605282924.webp https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16996108608170676.webp (notice how his blood formed a clown nose for him, fitting for the bozo he is)

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16996108599132674.webp

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16996111417718868.webp Atchison's body displayed several neo-Nazi symbols and words on his skin. These symbols included a swastika, SS runes, and the acronym "AMOG" (manosphere slang for "Alpha Male of Group") on his upper thigh. The phrase "BUILD WALL" appeared above his left knee, and "your home" on the right of his groin. Atchison's toxicology report revealed that no drugs or alcohol were present in his body on the day of the shooting.

Atchison had no previous criminal record; however, he was investigated by the FBI in March 2016, due to his online posts indicating his interest in purchasing weapons for a mass shooting. He came to the attention of the FBI when he asked on an internet forum "where to find cheap assault rifles for a mass shooting." Atchison told FBI investigators that he was simply "trolling" :troll: , and the investigation was subsequently closed when it was determined that, other than an airsoft pellet gun, Atchison did not own a firearm at the time.

Planning and preparation

In November 2017, Atchison traveled to Sportsman's Warehouse in Farmington, where he legally purchased a 9mm Glock 19 Gen4 semi-automatic pistol that he would later use in the December attack on the school. Several weeks before the attack, Atchison visited Aztec High School to do surveillance. He was escorted around the school and given a tour. Atchison's father later told police that his son played a video game that allowed him to simulate a practice run of the school shooting.

Extra photos

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/1699610858645668.webp

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16996108620979683.webp

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16996108624994981.webp

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16996108627181294.webp

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16996115712654154.webp

Conclusion

A new 9mm Glock costs at least $400 and probably more like $550. That's half a grand that Atchison could have used to improve his life. Some IT studies to bolster his résumé? A second-hand car, to widen his job prospects? He gave up completely on trying to have a meaningful life.

William's long, slow descent into madness began when he joined Encyclopedia Dramatica at the age of 11. Fast forward to a decade later, he was so drained of the will to live or accomplish anything that he decided to carry out a school shooting, just like the many he had obsessively worshiped and cataloged in ED articles. His dreams of attaining immortality were tragically shot down by the fact that he was a useless pussy who couldn't even get past a sofa barricade held by an elderly woman, just as he had secretly feared all along.

None
150
Transgender "penises"

Here you see a simple outline of the creation of a flesh sausage. So simple you could do it at home!

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16859304926866422.webp

However, not all skin-hotdogs are made from the legs. Here you see how the skin can also be taken from the forearm.

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16859304930167978.webp

And here's how it looks when all healed up...

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16859304931962235.webp

Haha, you can see the tattoo is missing!

Now, a petite showcase of some various artificial meat-bulges that I've found...

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16859304933885784.webp

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16859304935688825.webp

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16859304938600714.webp

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16859304941105006.webp

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/16859304942594998.webp

Heh, you could squirt some mustard on that and eat it like a corndog! :marseyhealthy:

So, straight women of WPD (if there is such a thing here). Would YOU let that thing fuck you? Hell, let's not limit this to women. Men, would you blow this eldritch monstrosity? Would you take that abomination of modern medicine up the ass? Would you be willing to let this Frankenstein's penis penetrate you as deep as it could possibly go? Don't worry, there's no judgement here. I have nothing against anyone's personal kinks, quirks, or autogynephillic fantasies :marseytransflag2:

:#marseyprideflag:

None

None

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/1693945738585771.webp

None

THIS VIDEO IS ONE OF THE TAKEDOWN OFFICERS

This video is all in one

Side by side of both body cams synced up

None
1282

None
631
Man records himself shooting someone in the face 5 times

I dont know any info of the location or people in this video.

THIS IS A REPOST: https://watchpeopledie.tv/h/shooting/post/2809/guys-eye-almost-pops-out-after

None
137
Livestream Video Of Buffalo Mass Shooting

None
55
Death2Kuffar (2008) [17min]

You might know it from the "Disturbing Movie Iceberg Level 8"

This one was hard to find, hope you like it.

An uninterrupted parade of beheadings, disembowelments, assassinations by firearms and other monstrosities carried out by the "soldiers of Allah".

For a little over a quarter of an hour, the viewer is literally intoxicated with abominable images perpetrated in front of their own cameras by the fanatical mujahideen of Al Qaeda and the future Islamic State, for the sole purpose of terrorist propaganda to planetary scale.

![](/images/1663615176137107.webp)

None

(Full photo timelapse on the bottom)

 

Kelly Ronahan quickly became an internet star by documenting her story online. However as time went on fans became suspicious of the reality of Kelly’s situation. 

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/17018992868367972.webp https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/17018992869827068.webp

At the beginning of 2019 her legs were alright and by May 2021 she got her legs amputated 

The tragic story of Kelly Ronahan. Munchausen syndrome or a misdiagnosis? 

 

2014-2016: Blood transfusions and undiagnosed condition

In 2014 Kelly became an Instagram star. She needed weekly blood transfusions to manage a rare blood disease. Kelly’s hemoglobin count took a nosedive and doctors couldn’t figure out why.

By March 2016, she had received a whopping 95 liters of blood from over 55 generous donors.

However, she continued to deteriorate. Her story garnered sympathy from netizens, who showered her with support. Ronahan joined a blood donation organization to motivate people to donate blood.

At various points, she attributed her condition to multiple sclerosis and uterine fibroids, though evidence was scarce.

 

2016: Seizures and hospitalizations

In July 2016, Ronahan was admitted to hospitals for seizures. However, doctors discharged her after discovering that she was faking them.

Despite these revelations, she continued to receive blood drives and an outpouring of support from her followers. Throughout 2016, people organized several blood drives in her name. 

 

https://i.imgur.com/zFmni29.jpg

Kelly's legs before it all started (unknown date)

 

2017: Inflammation, sepsis, and eating disorders

In early 2017, Kelly’s port became infected, leading to sepsis. Ronahan also informed her followers that she’d been suffering from eating disorders. She also claimed to have harmed herself before she got sick, but the scars didn't seem to be 3 years old.

Shortly before her planned discharge, Kelly developed seizures and a rash. In April 2017, Kelly went to the hospital for a different reason and had her blood drawn. 

Tests revealed that her hemoglobin count was normal, sparking speculation that she’d been faking a rare condition for attention. Kelly refuted the speculation by accusing the doctor of scheming against her. 

By 2018, rumors that Kelly was faking it had really gained traction.

In April 2018, doctors removed her port because she didn’t need transfusions anymore. 

 

2018-2019: Leg issues and autoimmune disease diagnosis

Ronahan’s mysterious leg condition appeared in 2018 and spread rapidly in the coming months. 

A month later, Kelly’s reported swelling on her feet and blisters that allegedly appeared out of nowhere. https://i.imgur.com/aoeaXbg.png https://i.imgur.com/kpF44Sm.png https://i.imgur.com/JtYP0mT.jpg https://i.imgur.com/tGpOFHe.jpg The blisters got bigger as Kelly impulsively picked on them. She claimed to be in so much pain that she needed pain meds, but doctors refused to prescribe the medication. 

https://i.imgur.com/2mAWJpc.jpg https://i.imgur.com/NCR8yBO.jpg https://i.imgur.com/XlllFHx.jpg https://i.imgur.com/PMOmP5M.jpg https://i.imgur.com/sCWuLnX.jpg

Kelly’s condition got worse as 2018 progressed: the scabs turned into much larger wounds. The medical mystery got more complicated when Ronahan suffered seizures and developed blisters on her hands. 

https://i.imgur.com/RQNH8PX.jpg https://i.imgur.com/wBMBwY2.jpg https://i.imgur.com/3cL0Jes.jpg https://i.imgur.com/5rFRieJ.jpg https://i.imgur.com/dNa63ga.jpg https://i.imgur.com/jcpojE9.jpg https://i.imgur.com/TFv7NZC.jpg https://i.imgur.com/DkJIXmL.jpg https://i.imgur.com/NrOLtcX.jpg https://i.imgur.com/oK7Gp0v.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/5cFp3L2.jpg

https://i.imgur.com/Yl0DcOS.png https://i.imgur.com/ZsFNC3G.jpg https://i.imgur.com/6gOeUJP.jpg https://i.imgur.com/stJvXKu.jpg https://i.imgur.com/FmPV8jQ.jpg https://i.imgur.com/88x2uBB.jpg https://i.imgur.com/bdU6Hp8.jpg https://i.imgur.com/c03pYOQ.jpg https://i.imgur.com/LtFffxt.jpg https://i.imgur.com/y23b33J.jpg https://i.imgur.com/tnChY9K.jpg https://i.imgur.com/N8rj4gE.jpg https://i.imgur.com/E0VMgo0.jpg

Eventually, she was diagnosed with an autoimmune disease in 2019 and underwent skin grafts in the hope of a better future. Several weeks later, Kelly returned to the hospital after picking the wounds on her legs. 

 

https://i.imgur.com/3x0kXT7.jpg https://i.imgur.com/kMdQFKU.jpg https://i.imgur.com/bDzfe5U.jpg https://i.imgur.com/41wCGIq.jpg https://i.imgur.com/9SWnnYD.jpg https://i.imgur.com/ZeIAZ1N.png

Photo that appears to be edited to enchance the damage  (distorted wall)

 

https://i.imgur.com/TFUCpu2.jpg https://i.imgur.com/12BVOYa.jpg https://i.imgur.com/RCqOcyu.jpg https://i.imgur.com/2JHoqrW.jpg https://i.imgur.com/NmHKfcY.png

Another photo that seems to be edited

 

Multiple experts looked at her case, but none could diagnose her condition. As time went by, Kelly reported the loss of feeling in her legs and ankles. 

 

2021: Kelly Ronahan underwent a leg amputation

Eventually, doctors recommended that she undergo amputation. By then, one of her toes had fallen off. 

https://i.imgur.com/WRrgUPz.jpg https://i.imgur.com/8cfXDl4.jpg

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/17018992854333913.webp https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/17018992865941713.webp

Photo Kelly posted on her Instagram a day before her amputation 

 

In May 2021, Kelly underwent a leg amputation as a last resort to save her life.

https://i.imgur.com/2ujp93N.jpg https://i.imgur.com/ccu1yP0.jpg https://i.imgur.com/T1Hjp3m.jpg

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/17018992851014802.webp

 

Where is Kelly Ronahan Today?

As of the latest updates, there is no publicly known information about Kelly’s whereabouts since her surgery.

Kelly’s social media posts reduced gradually after her surgery. She’d revealed her intention to get prosthetics and is likely to update her followers about her progress. 

 

Kelly's legs timelapse, over 150 photos and videos.

None
1482
Dude executes the most audiovisual beheading ever: you can see and hear every detail

Kirkuk, Iraq.

No backstory.

Longer version provided by @sog:

Longer version with better quality provided by @jajresko:

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/17037781322240908.webp

None
78
Russian lathe accident. with aftermath photos.

I know there are some aftermath photos of this incident, haven't been able to find them yet. If anybody knows where to find them, upload them here or send me a link. Thanks to: @blue_wants_death he posted them bellow in a comment.

None
730
Old man died while having sex

None
843
EFFORTPOST Today's school shooting in Prague

Today, just 1 hour ago, there was a shooting at the Faculty of Arts Charles University in Prague, Czech Republic. The shooter has been identified as David Kozàk, his identity card photo seen below:

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/17031757768574264.webp

Kozàk shot and killed his own father before the shooting. Here's a rough timeline of how things happened.

12:20 - the police recieved a call that the shooter has left his home in Hostoň (Kladno district) and shared an intention to commit suicide.

12:45 - the police find the body of the shooters dead father at home with his own rifle.

The police try to track the shooter down, finding out he is a student of the Faculty of Philosophy in Carlos University and had a class there at 14:00.

The police evacuate the bulding he has the class in, finishing at 14:22.

14:59 - the police is informed that shots have been fired at a different building of the Faculty of Arts & Philosophy.

15:20 - the shooter was found dead at the balcony of the building.

Videos of the shooter on-site have also been released, thanks to @Filsek and @Slavo, picturing Kozàk shooting at the streets with his rifle:

Kozàk held a diary on Telegram with various messages hinting at the shooting and claiming that he got inspiration from Alina Afanaskina, the Brynsk school shooter. Credit for the diary to @Slavo, @Porro and @VOMITOXINE. (the text looks off because it has been translated from Russian):

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/17031794240721858.webp

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/1703178247107696.webp

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/17031760152215316.webp

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/17032826951536758.webp

People were also spotted while hiding from the shooter on the ledge of the building, 2nd picture thank to @profile:

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/17031757769356189.webp

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/17031798225201826.webp

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/1703183685358728.webp

While some barricated themselves in rooms:

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/17031757773744583.webp

But some of them weren't so lucky:

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/17032735565361762.webp

in this video you can hear gunshots, sirens and evacuation alarms while people were fleeing:

some gunshots were also recorded by a dash-cam in a car:

while this video was recorded by a bystander:

at the top left of the video youcan see the shooter on the balcony of the building:

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/17031947477569046.webp

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/17031947491953912.webp

People evacuated the area and the shooter committed suicide by jumping off the building shooting himself in the throat (though this still has to be confirmed), while the police officers were trying to reach him:

photos and videos of the police officers:

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/1703175777801163.webp

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/1703175778121321.webp

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/17031757784211044.webp

bodycam footage has also been released by the Czech authorities and can be viewed on YouTube:

photo of his rifle, a ZEV AR-30, either chambered in 5.56 or .308, with what seems to be a $2000+ Leupold VX5/6 HD scope and $500SPUHR CAD scope mount, after he threw it off the building and it broke into pieces:

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/17031786829252257.webp

inside the building, they also found various other ammunition and weapons, including a Glock 17 with a B&T USW frame, images courtesy of @FrankPond:

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/17032885633408108.webp

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/17032885641227076.webp

Following is a list of people who lost their lives in the shooting, will update as more people are identified

Lenka Hlávková (49), muzicologist https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/17032889259437766.webp

Jan Dlask (50), Finnish and Swedish literature specialist https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/17032889264463995.webp

Lenka Špindlerová (20), Deaf language and communication studies student https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/17032889264887266.webp

Klára Holcová (20), Archival and bohemian studies student https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/1703288926577155.webp

Magdaléna Křístková, Deaf language and communication studies student https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/1703288926616883.webp

Aneta Richterová, student https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/17032889266727262.webp

thank you @Slavo, @sdsdsdsdsdsd and everyone else for sending additional videos/images and the diary of the shooter :)

Kozàk is allegedly also responsible for the murder of a father and their infant baby in the Klánovice forest, just a week before the shooting. For now, 10 people were killed and 30 people were injured, with 5 of them in serious condition. The victim count has reached 14 dead and 25 injured now. I will update this post as more info comes through from the media, stay tuned.

None

Pardon the cat thumbnail.

The part you're looking for is probably his username. It's @Took2much, the same as his Discord handle was. Feel free to deface the account's wall as much as you want. Unlike his accounts elsewhere (TikTok, Reddit, Instagram, etc.), WPD will not be hiding this monstrous freak's profile from those who want to see the banality of evil.

He wasn't very active here; he posted 10 comments during his stay. He was last active on the site at 22:45 local (to him) time the day before the shooting. The last thing he did here was downvote this comment -

https://watchpeopledie.tv/h/discussion/post/109413/whats-your-favorite-mass-shooting/2391791#context

about Dave Cullen's award winning book “Columbine,” which I've come to learn is hated by the weird Columbine fandom because it portrays their heroes as the losers they really were.

Ironically, I ordered the book myself in the wake of the shooting because of a convoluted series of shitposts about Marilyn Manson:

https://i.watchpeopledie.tv/images/17050315054821026.webp

but that's neither here nor there.

Here's one of many articles about the shooting

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/rcna132748

It was thankfully extremely incompetent and carried about by a fat, ugly retard who managed to kill a child and himself and no one else despite lying in wait for unarmed children for hours.

Rot in piss @Took2much.


Credit to @NotYou for bringing this to our attention.

None
108
186mph/300kmh Motorcycle Crash (+Aftermath In Comments)

Several bikes were riding at insane speed on the Bursa-Istanbul road. The camera recorded the speed up to 298km/h before the crashing happen.

This accident happened after one of the biker collided with another slower biker which then threw him up in the air.

Turkey – 21th November 2016

Link copied to clipboard
Action successful!
Error, please refresh the page and try again.